|
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 02:42am
|
|||
|
|||
|
NFHS RULES: Player recieves ball on free throw. Player B violates. Player A signals for Timeout. Official grants. Resuming Play is the delayed violation still in affect or does the timeout negate it? Does player A still get the extra throw from B's violation prior to time out? Can't figure this one out. Help. Thanks.
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 04:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
9.4.1.C.
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 09:45am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't see this covered specifically in rules. I say no violation in your scenario. The delayed violation and signal assumes the shooter is making a try for the free throw and is continuing through that process. The time-out breaks that string of proceedures. Spirit of the rules you hold violations during the attempt. team chose not to attempt.
__________________
"Sports do not build character. They reveal it" - Heywood H. Broun "Officiating does not build character. It reveal's it" - Ref Daddy
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 09:53am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The player will still get his free throws etc., Thanks David
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 09:54am
|
|||
|
|||
|
This was discussed in a past post. I believe the violation would still be in effect based on that discussion. I'll try and find the thread unless someone else out there can find it first.
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words".
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 10:10am
|
|||
|
|||
|
For those of you confused by BZ's case play reference, he was almost right. Unfortunately, his dyslexia kicked in temporarily. What he meant was 9.1.4C. (You still have a delayed violation.)
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 10:45am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, so let me see if I understand this:
A receives ball for FT attmpt. prior to shooting B commits lane violation (steps into lane or whateve), A calls timeout before the attempt. What I am hearing is that A will get a free shot on first attempt and if missed would get a re-attempt. That sound about right here. I don't have my rulebook yet so I can't look it up. Wingin' it
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 11:14am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 11:20am
|
|||
|
|||
|
9.1.4 SITUATION C: A1 is preparing to attempt a free throw. Prior to A1's release of the ball, B1 fakes causing A2 to enter the lane prematurely. A1 then requests and is granted a time-out. RULING: Upon resuming play, A1 is entitled to a free throw and the official shall use the proper signal indicating a violation by B1 prior to the granting of the time-out. If the free throw is successful, the violation is ignored, if unsuccessful a substitute throw is awarded.
__________________
"Sports do not build character. They reveal it" - Heywood H. Broun "Officiating does not build character. It reveal's it" - Ref Daddy
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 11:23am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you ever feel like your stuff strutted off without you?
|
|
Fri Feb 11, 2005, 12:02pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had asked about this a couple of weeks ago, because NCAA women's came out with this very interpretation. It didn't seem logical at first; in fact several people said they wouldn't call it that way because they thought the free throw attempt had ended with the timeout request. But I had a couple of people mention it to me this way - when B1 steps in, it's a violation, with a specific penalty, (albeit a delayed one), and A calling a timeout wouldn't wipe away that penalty, like WyMike said. The confusion seems to come in with the "delayed" part. But it's still a violation, with a specific penalty.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
