The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Batman and Robin (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/17265-batman-robin.html)

ChuckElias Fri Dec 31, 2004 09:03am

Quote:

Originally posted by Nevadaref
If I recall it is allowed in NCAA games, but if one coach gets 2Ts the other one has to go out the door with him.
I've never heard of this, Nevada. I don't think NCAA allows co-(head)coaches. Could be wrong, I guess, but that would really surprise me.

Nevadaref Fri Dec 31, 2004 09:32am

Quote:

Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:

Originally posted by Nevadaref
If I recall it is allowed in NCAA games, but if one coach gets 2Ts the other one has to go out the door with him.
I've never heard of this, Nevada. I don't think NCAA allows co-(head)coaches. Could be wrong, I guess, but that would really surprise me.

Ah, Chuck, how could you doubt me? I'm so hurt.

Holy smokes, Batman! There's co-head coaches over there!
:)
BR-144 RULE 10-9/FOULS AND PENALTIES
Section 10. Penalty for Unsporting Conduct of Bench Personnel
Art. 4. All of the direct technical fouls mentioned in Section 9 of this Rule shall be charged to the offender, shall also be charged/assessed to the head coach or co-head coaches and shall count toward the teamfoul total.
Art. 6. The head coach or co-head coaches shall be ejected after (a) two direct technical fouls have been assessed to him, her or them, (b) three bench direct technical fouls have been charged to his or her team or (c) a combination of one direct technical foul and two bench technical fouls have been assessed to him, her or them.



[Edited by Nevadaref on Dec 31st, 2004 at 09:35 AM]

Mark Padgett Fri Dec 31, 2004 01:32pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
The games that started this thread turns out there were "co-head-coaches". My partner was the R. He had not clarified who was head coach. The guy who was at the coaches' conference was up for the first few minutes of the game. Then the other guy asks for time out. I thoughtlessly gave it to him, then realized I shouldn't have. After the time out, partner went and talked to the first guy, and asked for clarification. He says, "We're co-coaches so we can both request TO's and be up." Partner says no way. So the guy who had been at the coaches conference says he's the head coach. But it was the other guy that was up the most. We spoke to it a couple of times, finally got it under control.

So what's with the co-coach thing? Since when is this a good idea?!?

Juulie - as you probably know, the "co-coach" situation occurred at Oregon City HS with the girls team after Brad returned from his brief college coaching stint. The district and conference allowed this unusual situation, but he and Carl were required to indicated to the officials which one was acting as head coach for the game. As long as this happens, I think it's OK.

rainmaker Sat Jan 01, 2005 01:46am

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
The games that started this thread turns out there were "co-head-coaches". My partner was the R. He had not clarified who was head coach. The guy who was at the coaches' conference was up for the first few minutes of the game. Then the other guy asks for time out. I thoughtlessly gave it to him, then realized I shouldn't have. After the time out, partner went and talked to the first guy, and asked for clarification. He says, "We're co-coaches so we can both request TO's and be up." Partner says no way. So the guy who had been at the coaches conference says he's the head coach. But it was the other guy that was up the most. We spoke to it a couple of times, finally got it under control.

So what's with the co-coach thing? Since when is this a good idea?!?

Juulie - as you probably know, the "co-coach" situation occurred at Oregon City HS with the girls team after Brad returned from his brief college coaching stint. The district and conference allowed this unusual situation, but he and Carl were required to indicated to the officials which one was acting as head coach for the game. As long as this happens, I think it's OK.

That's where we ended up, too, but it took us until about the middle of the third quarter. Believe me this won't happen to me again. It was a royal pain in the neck. From now on, it goes into my coaches' meeting: "So each of you ia the head coach? You may be off the bench, you may request time-outs, you may address us politely at any dead ball. Your assistants must remain on the bench, and may not address us."

dblref Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:25am

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
The games that started this thread turns out there were "co-head-coaches". My partner was the R. He had not clarified who was head coach. The guy who was at the coaches' conference was up for the first few minutes of the game. Then the other guy asks for time out. I thoughtlessly gave it to him, then realized I shouldn't have. After the time out, partner went and talked to the first guy, and asked for clarification. He says, "We're co-coaches so we can both request TO's and be up." Partner says no way. So the guy who had been at the coaches conference says he's the head coach. But it was the other guy that was up the most. We spoke to it a couple of times, finally got it under control.

So what's with the co-coach thing? Since when is this a good idea?!?

Had this happen a couple of years ago in a JVG game. My partner and I went over to introduce ourselves. There were 2 very attractive female coaches. I was the R and when I asked who was the head coach, one of them smiled wickedly and said "we are co-coaches and we share everything". I guess I must have blushed because the other coach started laughing and said "it works everytime". I did manage to find out who was the HC for that game. My partner cracked up laughing at me when she made her comment.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1