Quote:
Originally posted by BushRef
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
Quote:
Originally posted by BushRef
Quote:
Originally posted by gordon30307
Quote:
Originally posted by BushRef
Quote:
Originally posted by IAABO_Ref
That's for a reach and hitting the ball out of the throwers hand.
|
The comment says a throw in plance violation OR interfering with the ball following a goal--not just hitting it out of their hand. And if, as the original poster said later, the player sent the ball 12 feet back to the wall, I've got a T on the team defending the throw-in at this point in the game.
|
Could be a T (If unsporting) proper call is a warning for delay. Give ball back (hand it to the team throwing it in this time) to original team. Seven second left in the game defensive team has gained an advatage (odds highly stacked against them I admit) because you did stop the clock with the T. Incidently I might "hold my whistle" and get it down to 3 seconds before I called the violation.
|
Huh??
|
Riddle me this why would you call a Technical Foul? Assuming of course no warning for delay has previously been given and defensive team has not reached across the plane and touched the ball?
|
They have interfered with the throw in teams opportunity to throw in the ball. Normally, this is a warning the first time, but when it happens late in the game like this and the defending team would gain an advantage by having the clock stopped on only a warning, the casebook calls for a T with no warning.
|
The defending team is losing. It's to their advantage to stop the clock. I fail to see how the defending team (if losing) is gaining an advantage by preventing the team that is winning from inbounding the ball.
Thu Nov 18, 2004, 03:21pm
Threaded Mode
