![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
However, was Shaq fouled when the clock stopped for this instant? Or, IOW, was the clock stopping the result of Shaq being fouled? YES = the Grizzlies were hosed because the clock should have stopped at about 1.1 left (was *clearly* before time expired and I remember someone saying there is no lag time in the NBA). Then, the Grizzlies could have had a chance to tie or win the game, with time on the clock. NO = Shaq might not have got the shot off before time expired OR the Grizzlies would have had the extra time to make a play. (After calling a timeout on a rebound or after the basket. & Does the clock not stop after a basket in the NBA with under a certain amount of time left?) Regardless, there are what-ifs that Vancouver had a legitimate aruguement about, that the players DID NOT determine the outcome of the game, but rather the game was influenced by a timing error. By golly, I should hope that in the NBA, who goes all-out at using quality officials and state-of-the-art timing devices, that a timing error is a correctable error. was Shaq fouled before the clock stopped? YES = timing error. Stopped too late. Grizzlies should get more time on the clock. NO = timing error. It had no reason to stop whatsoever. Shaq's actions might have been different. Was Shaq fouled after the clock was stopped? YES = timing error. Stopped too early. Grizzlies should get more time on the clock. NO = timing error. It had no reason to stop whatsoever. Shaq's actions might have been different. The way I see it, there was a timing error. Grizzlies got hosed. ..Mike [Edited by JugglingReferee on Feb 4th, 2001 at 05:22 PM] |
Bookmarks |
|
|