|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
[/B][/QUOTE]Should be first airborne player going from front to back court, Coach. Almost the same situation---defender intercepts a pass with one foot on ground in front court, and then steps into the back court with the other foot after establishing player/team control---> backcourt violation. Btw, welcome to the forum, Coach. |
|
|||
Quote:
Btw, welcome to the forum, Coach. [/B][/QUOTE] Right--I understood it that way--just failed to include that detail in my previous post. Thanks. |
|
|||
Quote:
Interestingly, NCAA moved away from that interp to the current FED interp (the exception applies only to the airborne player catching the pass / jump). |
|
|||
Why 99 is true
I think of it this way when it comes to the division line during a throw in...
It disappears. As in a jump ball (see case 9.9.1 sit b), the division line only appears once a player with the ball has established themselves on the floor (not where they took off from). And both the jump ball and throw ins are referenced in 4.12.6 If you read 9.9.3 closely, it notes "...player legally jumping from his/her frontcourt...return to the floor with one or more feet on backcourt...it makes no difference whether the first foot down is in the frontcourt or backcourt." As for the "pass" twist, it still doesn't matter as again, the line doesn't appear until a player who has contact with the floor has possession of the ball. This basically all comes down the fact that there is no team control during a throw in. So I answered 99 true (at least using this line of thought). |
|
|||
Re: Why 99 is true
Quote:
[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Nov 11th, 2004 at 01:06 PM] |
Bookmarks |
|
|