Fri Jul 09, 2004, 11:18am
|
 |
Keeper of the HAMMER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Actually Snag it would not be a Technical foul
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by devdog69
Actually Damian, you've got this mixed up... If there is contact and the ball is live it can't be technical, it is by definition personal, either common, intentional, or flagrant. However, if there is NO contact then it can be deemed unsportsmanlike, which is technical in nature.
|
You cannot call a T for this act anymore.
If there is contact all you can call is a PC Foul, a Flagrant or Intentional Fouls.
If there is no contact, then all you have is a violation. They changed that rule about 2 years ago.
Peace
|
Rut,
They've gone and changed the context here. Damian and Rob are talking about fighting. If the elbow looks like a punch, you could conceivably call a flagrant T (even during a live ball) if it misses. Just as you would a failed punch.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
|
Hybrid Mode
