The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 09:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 426
Send a message via AIM to dhodges007 Send a message via Yahoo to dhodges007
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
At camp this weekend, another camper and I were working with one of the evaluators (3-person). I was lead, camper-partner (CP) was trail, eval (E) was at C. I notice a competetive match-up just moving into my primary at the top of the key with A2 getting into position to receive a pass, and B2 behind her, and beat to the play. B2 grabs A1's jersey with both hands. ...
Juulie,
When I got to here I thought intentional.
For me grabbing an opponent's jersey is always an intentional foul. Of course, this thinking probably comes from my soccer reffing experience, where it is a yellow card.
I agree with those that said it is not a basketball play. This is not just an ordinary foul during the course of the game, therefore, I believe that it needs to be penalized more harshly.

But what does any of this thread have to do with the X on the floor in front of the scorer?
Nothing at all. That's a small x.

I see the point about calling it intentional. I just was surprised, and it got me thinking.

One thing I'm having trouble getting the hang of is when to get tough and when to be flexible. At the moment of the call, I thought she was really overreacting, but her explanation makes sense, and now I see that most of you (with one exception worthy of consideration) agreed with it. I expect it's just a matter of logging some more floor time, but I wish I could come up with a more intellectual rationale for what needs stern response and what doesn't.
Stern responses would be non-basketball plays IMO. Grabbing the arm, shirt, leg, throwing elbows, baiting and taunting are all non bb plays and should be dealt with sternly. Set the guidelines in the beginning and you (hopefully) won't have to deal with that crap when you are in the last few mins.
__________________
~Hodges

My two sense!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 10:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
I will mention to a coach (if I get a chance) that he should maybe find another way of telling his kids to foul. A lot of coaches now use code words to let their ballplayers know when they want them to foul.
My (2-person) mechanics have become comfortable enough that I am able to pay more attention now to the game, and I've started noticing how coaches call these plays. I listen for the play calls throughout the game, so I can anticipate the play (never the call, tho!). One guy, who I heard reviewing the "strategic foul" in a last-minute-time-out, would say, "..wait...wait...wait...CODE RED!!! CODE RED!!!" It worked fine for helping the players know what to do. Too bad it let both teams know.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 10:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 778
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
At camp this weekend, another camper and I were working with one of the evaluators (3-person). I was lead, camper-partner (CP) was trail, eval (E) was at C. I notice a competetive match-up just moving into my primary at the top of the key with A2 getting into position to receive a pass, and B2 behind her, and beat to the play. B2 grabs A1's jersey with both hands. A2 wasn't hampered much, and I was going to give it a pass, when E (at C) cracks the whistle and comes up with The Big X -- yup, an intentional foul. Coach B and crowd go bananas, of course.

Later, when we talked about it, E sounded very reasonable and her thinking made sense, but I would never have even thought about it. CP and I just looked at her and listened with a sort of blank stare, and nodded. Her rationale was that this was "not a basketball play," and the book talks about taking away a clear advantage (the actually wording is, "to neutralize an opponent's obvious advantageous position"), and not making a play on the ball. These reasons made sense to me, and besides she's a very experienced ref around here, who works as high as some of the minor D1 conferences.

I'd be interested in y'all's opinions on this call.
This is an easier call to make if you're an evaluator at a camp working with some campers. You are going to have the confidence to make this call if you want to. I doubt that she would have the onions to make this call in a D-I game where she is the one being evaluated. It's a different perspective.
__________________
Church Basketball "The brawl that begins with a prayer"
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 11:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
[QUOTE]Originally posted by devdog69
Quote:
This is an easier call to make if you're an evaluator at a camp working with some campers. You are going to have the confidence to make this call if you want to. I doubt that she would have the onions to make this call in a D-I game where she is the one being evaluated. It's a different perspective.
Amen to that devdog!

Z
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 11:35am
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Talking

Juulie - does this sound familiar?

"BANANAS, BANANAS, BANANAS" usually followed by TWEET and the dreaded X (depending on who's working the game).
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Juulie - does this sound familiar?

"BANANAS, BANANAS, BANANAS" usually followed by TWEET and the dreaded X (depending on who's working the game).
Yea, but I never call it an X unless the foul itself warrants it. I know we're supposed to if there are verbal instructions to foul, but if the kid makes an honest attempt to go for the ball, or tries to set a screen, I'll call it just a foul.

The hardest ones are when the "strategic" foul isn't really hard enough to call, but you know that if you don't call it, the next one will be a tackle. That frustrates the heck out of me.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 12:22pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Exclamation Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
The hardest ones are when the "strategic" foul isn't really hard enough to call, but you know that if you don't call it, the next one will be a tackle. That frustrates the heck out of me.
This happened to me a coupla years ago:

Anticipating the end-o'-game "strategic foul", I whistled one of those *tweener* fouls and got a major look of discontent from the defensive player.
The contact coulda been enough, ... or not.
Took the player outa the game, I think.



I quit doin' it.
Now, for me it has to be a foul.

When I think about it, it occurred to me that by calling the type of contact that I called, I was in fact buying the defense a little more time (even if they wanted the foul).

No more. If it happens to escalate, I can cross my forearms.

mick
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 12:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by mick
When I think about it, it occurred to me that by calling the type of contact that I called, I was in fact buying the defense a little more time (even if they wanted the foul).
This seems to me like an important point. When they're just barely fouling, and not really getting the job done, and then the offensive coach starts screaming about not calling the fouls, I say, "Coach, do you want to stop the clock and give them the ball?" Then like you say, if they give the body-slam, it's capital X time.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
When I think about it, it occurred to me that by calling the type of contact that I called, I was in fact buying the defense a little more time (even if they wanted the foul).
This seems to me like an important point. When they're just barely fouling, and not really getting the job done, and then the offensive coach starts screaming about not calling the fouls, I say, "Coach, do you want to stop the clock and give them the ball?" Then like you say, if they give the body-slam, it's capital X time.
Most good coaches have no problem stopping the clock, that means they get to shoot FTs or will soon enough. As for letting the small "strategic" fouls go & waiting for the body slam, well, let's just say we disagree.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 01:44pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Re: Re: Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
.... let's just say we disagree.
You can say it if you want.
I won't.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 02:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: Re: Re: Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
.... let's just say we disagree.
You can say it if you want.
I won't.
mick
You're not being very scrutable today, are you?
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 02:48pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
.... let's just say we disagree.
You can say it if you want.
I won't.
mick
You're not being very scrutable today, are you?
Am too.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 03:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,674
Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
The hardest ones are when the "strategic" foul isn't really hard enough to call, but you know that if you don't call it, the next one will be a tackle. That frustrates the heck out of me.
This happened to me a coupla years ago:

Anticipating the end-o'-game "strategic foul", I whistled one of those *tweener* fouls and got a major look of discontent from the defensive player.
The contact coulda been enough, ... or not.
Took the player outa the game, I think.



I quit doin' it.
Now, for me it has to be a foul.

When I think about it, it occurred to me that by calling the type of contact that I called, I was in fact buying the defense a little more time (even if they wanted the foul).

No more. If it happens to escalate, I can cross my forearms.

mick
One of our primary concerns should be safety. By not calling that soft strategic foul you are encouraging the body slam or the big swinging hit. I'd rather be safe then have it escalate.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 03:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally posted by devdog69

This is an easier call to make if you're an evaluator at a camp working with some campers. You are going to have the confidence to make this call if you want to. I doubt that she would have the onions to make this call in a D-I game where she is the one being evaluated. It's a different perspective.
AND, a different coordinator of officials might hate that call. We all know that you can't please all the coaches all the time, but I've learned that you can't please all the refs all the time either.
__________________
Luther
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 06, 2004, 03:12pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Re: Re: Uncomfortable memory

Quote:
Originally posted by blindzebra

One of our primary concerns should be safety. By not calling that soft strategic foul you are encouraging the body slam or the big swinging hit. I'd rather be safe then have it escalate.
You are not correct.
I do not encourage flagrant fouls in any of my sports.
I do not encourage any form of unsporting conduct in any of my sports.
I am resentful.
mick
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1