The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2001, 03:49pm
Suppref
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A1 is 6'5" 260lbs and B1 is 6' 160lbs. Shot goes up and A1 just walks his way into the lane for a rebound. B1 is boxing out and obviously without actually pushing, A1 is able to get himself into a better rebounding position.

Do you have a foul? B1 is entitled to the space on the floor where he is standing. A1 just uses his weigtht to get to a spot.

I called A1 for the pushing foul(over the back). My partner felt it was a no call.

Your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2001, 04:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Greater Indianapolis Area
Posts: 436
Send a message via Yahoo to Indy_Ref
Thumbs up

If he pushed him, then yes! Foul on A1. If "incidental", no foul. I might have to see it but it sounds like you were ok with the right call.

[Edited by Indy_Ref on Jan 5th, 2001 at 03:14 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2001, 04:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 106
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by Suppref
Do you have a foul? B1 is entitled to the space on the floor where he is standing. A1 just uses his weigth to get to a spot.
A player is entitled to any spot on the floor provided that he/she gets there first without making illegal contact. Once a player has established such a position on the floor, he/she cannot displace an opponent nor be displaced from that position by an opponent.

Assuming a player has legally gained a spot on the floor, displacement at any time in the game by either the offense or defense should be called immediately. If the situation was as you described, I think you made the right call. B1 was legally there first and is protected by rule from being displaced by an opponent.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2001, 04:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 149
I've often felt that the bigger players are sometimes at a disadvantage in spite of their size when it comes to plays like that. A smaller player can nail him pretty hard from the official's off side and he won't be affected enough to cause the official to call a foul but he can barely bump a smaller player and disconcert him enough to get tagged. Consequently, the bigger players have to play better basketball because they are not going to get away with as much. A catch 22.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 05, 2001, 08:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Ralph,
As a coach of two huge (by our league's standards) 8th graders (6-3, 220 and 6-2, 180), I would agree that refs favoring the smaller player can be a problem for us at times - but not always. And I just got done watching 5 games where Eddy Curry (Chicago Thornwood, 6-11, 310) bodied everyone out of his way both posting up and going for rebounds. never got a sniff of foul trouble. The biggest and most skilled guy I saw guard him, Kelly Whitney, at 6-8, 220 wasn't going to be able to hold his ground against this guy, and refs didn't stop him from using his body to dislodge players. Whitney played excellent defense, too. It goes either way and probably depends on the bias of the referee.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 06, 2001, 12:59am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally posted by Ralph Stubenthal
I've often felt that the bigger players are sometimes at a disadvantage in spite of their size when it comes to plays like that. A smaller player can nail him pretty hard from the official's off side and he won't be affected enough to cause the official to call a foul but he can barely bump a smaller player and disconcert him enough to get tagged. Consequently, the bigger players have to play better basketball because they are not going to get away with as much. A catch 22.
Ralph,
I think we have a "duty" to protect the Big players from certain acts, even though, their play is not affected.
That's been a point of interest for me for several years.
I, too, consider, at times, that the Big Bodies are held to another set of rules, and I think that is unfair when it occurs.
mick
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 06, 2001, 02:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 294
Send a message via ICQ to BigDave
Hawks Coach,

Can you FAX me the birth certficates on your two 8th graders.
__________________
my favorite food is a whistle
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 06, 2001, 08:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,069
First.... LMAO @ BigDave

Secondly, I AGREE with HAWKS Coach.... Each Ref is gonna call it with "his/her" set of biases...

Third, I call the PUSH... Displacement (ie disadvantage from a legally established position) by A1's body is a foul.
__________________
"Stay in the game!"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 06, 2001, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,069
First.... LMAO @ BigDave

Secondly, I AGREE with HAWKS Coach.... Each Ref is gonna call it with "his/her" set of biases...

Third, I call the "PUSH"... Displacement (ie disadvantage from a legally established position) by A1's body is a foul.
__________________
"Stay in the game!"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 07, 2001, 07:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 298
Call the foul!
__________________
Pistol
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1