![]() |
3-person clinic today. Afterward, we're discussing a play I no-called, parent didn't agree; I'm describing situation, my fellow refs disagree with me! I'm very, very sure I remember this discussion here on the board, so I'm sticking to my guns. Tonight, we'll all be on e-mail talking about rule references and so on.
The situation is where a player is chasing a loose ball, tips the ball so it stays in-bounds. The player lands oob, then steps back in bounds and is the first to touch the ball. I hope you-all agree that it's legal. Corollary question: Above play but player only has one foot in-bounds, when she touches the ball, other foot in the air. Legal? Tertiary question: If a player is out of bounds, and then steps in with one foot only is the players legally in-bounds? And consequently, can a player who is in-bounding the ball, throw the ball so it bounces off the back of an inbounds player, step in with one foot and retrieve the ball? I say all of the above are legal. Some very good refs who I respect and look up to all disagree. I hope I'm right, and that you-all will concur. And if anyone can find some of the threads where we discussed this, I'll appreciate the help. |
You're right on all of them, Juulie. If NO part of you is touching OOB, you are in-bounds. It's that simple. Rules 7-1-1 and 4-35-1,2 are the references. Airborne players are covered under R4-35-3.
|
Quote:
I think your fellow official have either been working football too much or watching it. ;) Peace |
Quote:
Z |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
I do think there may be one from about three or four months ago, which I wish I could send along too, but I can't find it right off the bat. |
Tell'em your references are 7-1 and 7.1.
Then ask them for theirs'. They won't have any. |
Quote:
I already got back one e-mail that says, "Hey, you're right. I learned something today." That feels terrific! |
Quote:
Otherwise you are indeed right as far as FIBA as well |
All seem legal to me - my only question is can you have a tertiary question without having had a secondary question?
|
Isn't it nice to find out that you are better than you think you are? Seriously, I hope that the more seasoned officials who disagreed with you are big enough to admit they were wrong. I've run into the same situations, and you get the feeling that even though you are right and present it in a very diplomatic way, feathers are ruffled and you get a rep for being a "know it all".
|
Juulie,
Let us know the outcome of your follow-up with the other officials. As Zebra44 pointed out, it will be interesting to see if they are big enough to really learn without labeling you unfairly. I've got a lot of faith that if anyone can accomplish it, you can. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41am. |