[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
Originally posted by mdray
Quote:
Originally posted by Eric Huechteman
your sitch here does not fit the definition of an interrupted dribble -- this ball has not "deflected off the dribbler" or "gotten away from the dribbler"; I have an OOB violation when he/she next touches that ball.
|
Your argument is self-contradictory.
On one hand, you say that it's not an interrupted dribble because it doesn't fit the definition.
On the other hand, you say that you have the OOB when they next touch the ball.
Both can't be true. If it's not an interrupted dribble but is still within the normal dribble, it's a violation the instant the foot touches the line. If you wait to call it when they touch it again, you've implicity declared it an interrupted dribble, which then makes it no violation.
|
you're right! my mistake.... I should have ruled that I've got a violation here as soon as he/she steps out of bounds; this is not an interrupted dribble in my judgement
Mon Apr 19, 2004, 06:30pm
Threaded Mode
