The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 08, 2000, 06:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 57
I agree, the NCAA probably does need to define "point of interruption". As implemented it seems only to establish how the ball is made live after the free throws for the technical. All other rules (e.g., shot-clock reset) are unaffected.

Regarding abuse of the "return to point of interruption" (e.g. calling an excess timeout to get more shot-clock time), I haven't seen or heard of any real-life examples ... anyone else?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1