|
I agree, the NCAA probably does need to define "point of interruption". As implemented it seems only to establish how the ball is made live after the free throws for the technical. All other rules (e.g., shot-clock reset) are unaffected.
Regarding abuse of the "return to point of interruption" (e.g. calling an excess timeout to get more shot-clock time), I haven't seen or heard of any real-life examples ... anyone else?
|