![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() The greater the likelihood of A getting to the ball, the greater the chance for the T. The "more intentional" the act (or inaction -- intentionally remaining in the way) on the coach, the greater the likelihood for the T. (IOW, if he acts in instinct to catch a ball that's headed for his head, I'd likely not give a T; if he reaches to the side, I'd be more likely to do so.) So, I could have: 1) A violation on A -- there was no chance to get the ball; the coach's actions didn't affect play 2) The ball back to A -- the coach's actions affected play, but were unintentional* 3) T on Coach B -- intentionally interfered with play. * Take this similar, if unlikely, play: A 1 throws a baseball pass the length of the court toward A2. While the ball is in the air, one of the "climbing ropes" used for PE class comes loose and dangles over the court. The ball hits the rope. Sure, by rule, the ball hit an object OOB, so it should be a violation on A. But, since the oject wasn't there when the game started, couldn't be foreseen, etc., I'm just having a "do-over." |
Bookmarks |
|
|