Backcourt?

[BktBallRef]

Originally posted by bob jenkins
Also look at last year's 9-9 Exception 1 (iirc).

Did the FED intend this (unannounced) change, or is it a sloppy editing job?

Bob, this is the play that got buried on McGriff that we were discussing. Do you see why I was saying it's a violation?

The change is listed under Major Editorial Changes.
"9-9-3 New Article was added to replace the previous exceptions and note."

[OverAndBack]

Originally posted by JugglingReferee

Are you saying that you're a violation?

A violation of what, I'm wondering.

Sorry, first name I could think of that was ref-related.

[bob jenkins]

Originally posted by BktBallRef

Bob, this is the play that got buried on McGriff that we were discussing. Do you see why I was saying it's a violation?

The change is listed under Major Editorial Changes.
"9-9-3 New Article was added to replace the previous exceptions and note."

Yes -- I see why you say it's a violation. What I'm not sure about is whether the FED *wants* it to be a violation -- that is, did they intend to change what the rule says?