The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 04, 2000, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
Unhappy

I'm reading a case situation from the NCAA website that reads: After a field goal by B-1, with two minutes left to play, player B-2 reaches through the end line and slaps the ball from the hands of A-1. The official assesses an indirect technical foul for delay of game against B-2. Prior to the administration of the penalty for the indirect technical foul, A-1 taunts and baits B-2. Player A-1 is assessed a direct technical foul for his act.

I was reading the 99 NCAA rule book and the case book reads that reaching through the plane to slap the ball away from a thrower in is not a delay of game penalty, but rather a intentional technical foul, which would be two shots , not one.
Help on this one, please. What should we do in this situation? I see false double, but the question is whether to give Team A one shot or two shots. I originally thought 2 shots but the NCAA website says one. Just wanted some feedback!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 04, 2000, 04:34pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by JamieSlick
I'm reading a case situation from the NCAA website that reads: After a field goal by B-1, with two minutes left to play, player B-2 reaches through the end line and slaps the ball from the hands of A-1. The official assesses an indirect technical foul for delay of game against B-2. Prior to the administration of the penalty for the indirect technical foul, A-1 taunts and baits B-2. Player A-1 is assessed a direct technical foul for his act.

I was reading the 99 NCAA rule book and the case book reads that reaching through the plane to slap the ball away from a thrower in is not a delay of game penalty, but rather a intentional technical foul, which would be two shots , not one.
Help on this one, please. What should we do in this situation? I see false double, but the question is whether to give Team A one shot or two shots. I originally thought 2 shots but the NCAA website says one. Just wanted some feedback!
One shot on Indirect Technicals is new this year, Jamie in Mens' and Womens' game.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 04, 2000, 04:49pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Don't use the 99 rule book anymore!! The whole section on T's was changed...some are 1 shot, some are two...some were changed to indirect...most resume play from the point of interruption, but not all...get the new book and read it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 05, 2000, 03:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 176
Jamie ask Dudds about all the new changes... Have you written the CIAU exam yet?
SH
keep smiling
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 05, 2000, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally posted by JamieSlick
What should we do in this situation? I see false double, but the question is whether to give Team A one shot or two shots. I originally thought 2 shots but the NCAA website says one. Just wanted some feedback!
Jamie,

I believe you should go with what the NCAA website says. Which means: one shot for Team A for the (delay of game) indirect technical on B2, two shots for Team B for the (unsporting) direct technical on A1, then resume play with the throw-in by Team A and allow them to run the endline. I'm not sure about the order of free-throws, but it won't really matter since you still resume with the throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 06, 2000, 12:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 21
I realize that the Technical penalties have changed from last year, but my question is about the interpretation. The 99 book says slaaping the ball out of an opponent's hands during a throw in is an intentional technical foul, which is a two shots plus the ball penalty. The case in the website says this is a delay of game penalty, which is a one shot penalty plus continue. Which is it in this situation: One shot or 2 shots? (or more directly delay of game indirect technical or intentional technical)

JamieSlick
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 06, 2000, 08:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally posted by JamieSlick
I realize that the Technical penalties have changed from last year, but my question is about the interpretation. The 99 book says slaaping the ball out of an opponent's hands during a throw in is an intentional technical foul, which is a two shots plus the ball penalty. The case in the website says this is a delay of game penalty, which is a one shot penalty plus continue. Which is it in this situation: One shot or 2 shots? (or more directly delay of game indirect technical or intentional technical)

JamieSlick
One shot. The two-shot T's are (generally) for unsporting conduct. This isn't.

10-3-20.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1