Quote:
Originally posted by PAULK1
sometimes what seems to be the fair thing to do is in conflict with the rules this seems to be one of those situations.
Many states only recognize protests for a misapplication of the rules and in a situation like this it may arise.
It is clear what the rule/case wants you to do but it also gives you the leeway to make a judgement here. If you beleive the T would do more harm than good you don't have to do it.By removing the fan you have sent a clear message that this will not be tolerated.
While it may not be the fair thing to do the right thing is to follow the rule/case. If this were not covered by the rules you could make such a determination but since it is you should rule accordingly.
|
Reluctantly, I agree. The case play is clear. If it didn't exist, you could conceivably invoke 2-3. But the case play prevents that.
Sun Jan 18, 2004, 07:41pm
Hybrid Mode
