The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:48am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
The AP throw-in ends and the arrow is changed when B touches the ball, with a kick in this case.

A then gets the ball for a throw-in because of the kick. The AP thropw-in has ended.
I don't know how I missed this thread, but post #3 on page one (the one above) is the one with the right answer, all based on the definitions.

The arrow is changed when the throw-in ends. The throw-in ends when the ball is touched on the floor. The kick is that touch on the floor. Change the arrow to B. Award a throw-in (because of the kick) to A.

No unfair advantage given -- the throw-in is no longer an AP throw-in so after A completes the throw in the arrow will still be set to B, just like on a "normal" AP throw-in.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:49am
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,779
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker

The penalty isn't doubled, if the arrow isn't changed. They don't get the arrow taken away from them. If A inbounds the ball legally, even if B gets the ball legally, A has then used the arrow, and B gets the arrow.

What happens if B kicks the ball on the inbounds is that A gets penalized. Not because A made a bad basketball play, but because B violated. Why am I the only one that thinks that's unfair?

It's an exact parallel to losing or keeping the privilege of running the baseline. If B kicks the ball on the inbounds pass after a made basket, A gets that privilege back. How is keeping the arrow any different?
How does A get penalized? They've still got the ball. They would never have had it without the arrow. They haven't lost the arrow, they've already used it.
With the baseline, the new rule makes sure that A doesn't actually lose anything due to B's violation. With a kick after an AP, A doesn't lose a thing. They've still got the ball, and they got it due to the arrow.

Adam
In any other situation with an AP throw-in, they haven't used the arrow until the ball is legally inbounded. In this case the ball has not been legally inbounded, through no fault of their own, yet they lose the arrow. Which IS the same as the privilege of running the baseline. They don't lose the privilege because the opponent violates. If they lose the arrow on the kick, they are penalized for what THE OPPONENT did. They haven't used the arrow, they've had it taken away.
Not legally inbounded but when the throw-in ends, as per 6-3.
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 411
A simple way to clarify this rule is to add the word
LEGALLY.

The throw in ends when the ball is "LEGALLY" touched inbounds.

Or the clock cannot start until the ball is "LEGALLY" touched. (takes care of BBallref's scenario)

Juules,

I had a problem with this rule at first as well.
But I have reconciled in my mind (scary) that B really does not gain an advantage by kicking the ball.

A still gets the opportunity to throw the ball in due to the kick,(already stated by someone else) and they would lose the arrow anyway after a completed throw in.

I do see how your fouling scenario could yield a "possible" advantage by stealing the arrow, but is it truly an advantage? If the most they gain is posession of the arrow, that's a small reward to say the least. The game may, (most likely would) conclude without B using the AP arrow that they "stole".
Just my two cents.
__________________
There's a fine line between "hobby", and mental illness.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 02:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by DrakeM
A simple way to clarify this rule is to add the word
LEGALLY.

The throw in ends when the ball is "LEGALLY" touched inbounds.

Or the clock cannot start until the ball is "LEGALLY" touched. (takes care of BBallref's scenario)
But...it doesn't say that.

But I agree that, considering the present "run the endline" rule, they should have just re-worded all rules that pertain to "legally" inbounding the ball.

But...until they do.
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 09:02am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I think in this case, doing as you suggest would actually penalize B for A's bad throw. Had A1 passed the ball to a teammate, we wouldn't have this problem.
I don't think this is a valid blanket statement. A's (bounce?) pass could have been the perfect pass for that sitch - we can't penalize A for what /we/ think is a bad pass.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 09:03am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Why am I the only one that thinks that's unfair?
As Mrs. Tillman, my 11th grade English teacher used to ask, "Who said life was fair?"

Try this play:

B 56, A 55. 1.0 remaining to be played.

A inbounds the ball.

B kicks the ball.

Official starts clock,

Official blows whistle for violation.

Time expires before timer can stop clock.

Game over.
__________________________________________________ ____

Did B gain an advantage by kicking the ball? Yes.

Is there anything we can do about it? No.

"Who said life was fair?"
All the more reason everybody should use Precision Time. (tm)


LOL
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 09:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Irving, Texas
Posts: 675
Talking

Why did you let B56 into the game?
__________________
- SamIAm (Senior Registered User) - (Concerning all judgement calls - they depend on age, ability, and severity)
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 10:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by SamIAm
Why did you let B56 into the game?
Score, B 56, A 55

Been eatin' too much green eggs and ham, SamIAm.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Tony -- been out in the snow too long?
Thanks a lot Juules.

I get up this morning, look out the window.

It's snowing.

And it's you're fault!

It doesn't snow here.
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 11:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Tony -- been out in the snow too long?
Thanks a lot Juules.

I get up this morning, look out the window.

It's snowing.

And it's you're fault!

It doesn't snow here.
Sorry, Tony. I forgot to warn you that my spiritual gift is prophecy...
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 11:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Talking



Then, from hence forth, I decree that you will be forever known as...

...snowmaker, the white wizard!

Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 11:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
the white wizard!
Hmmmm, somebody been to the movies recently?
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 12:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Best movie I've seen in quite a while

Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
the white wizard!
Hmmmm, somebody been to the movies recently?
I would think that there could be some "hobbitses" in your ancestry.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef


Then, from hence forth, I decree that you will be forever known as...

...snowmaker, the white wizard!

Where did you find that flattering picture? I'm not nearly that attractive.
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jan 09, 2004, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 411
BBallref,

My point was that The NF, SHOULD make that simple clarification.
__________________
There's a fine line between "hobby", and mental illness.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1