Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by JCurrie
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
I thought the FED had amended this?
If T is opposite table, then T just returns and administers the throw-in. No need to run down the court and swithc with L.
If T is table side, then T switches with C.
|
They had, but this year they went back to the old mechanic
|
Jcurrie is correct, Bob. In 2001, the NF eliminated the long switch because the NCAA stated that they were going to continue not using it. A month later, after the NF books were printed, the NCAA went back to the long switch. That's what Mr. Knox told us when he was the Chairman of the Committee. He told us in 2001 that the NF would go back to long switches in 2003 an d so they did. But I still see a lot of guys, at both levels, not switching.
|
Yes, I understand the history. I thought they again changed it (after the books were printed this year) so that there "sometimes" was a long switch (when old L, new T was tableside) and "sometimes" not a long swithc (when old L, new T was already opposite table).
Maybe (probably) I'm wrong -- it's either a local interp, or a rumor for next year, or a compromise suggested by those who don't want to switch, but also don't want to not follow the rules, or ...
Sun Jan 04, 2004, 06:34pm
Threaded Mode
