|
Mon Dec 29, 2003, 01:57pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
MTD Sr. is correct. The point is to come up with enough Ts to give A a chance to win, which is what they had before B's unsporting act.
In a previous thread, the sitch had a sub entering the court an tackling A1 before he launched the last second shot. My opinion there was to give the T for entering the court illegally, plus an intentional (and flagrant) foul. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
