|
|||
Saw this on another site, do any of you who took the test last night differ on many of these? Specifically 16 and 93?
1 T 3-4 T 6-9 T 11-14 T 17-21 T 23-24 T 26-27 T 29-30 T 32-35 T 37 T 41 T 45-47 T 50-51 T 53-55 T 59 T 62 T 64 T 66-68 T 71 T 73-74 T 76 T 78-80 T 83-84 T 86-89 T 91-93 T 97-98 T all numbers not listed are false. |
|
|||
Where can I find the questions to review?
As an outsider to your profession, I am still interested in learning as much as I can about officiating. Where can I find the questions from this year's exam?
__________________
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them! - Friedrich Nietzsche - |
|
|||
Does anyone have the test they could fax me? I like to use the test to study. If so, please e-mail me. [email protected] or fax 217-586-8277.
[Edited by kenref1 on Dec 9th, 2003 at 09:17 AM] |
|
|||
Ugh! They made us turn in our test sheet along with our answer sheet. Apparently they'll mail them back to us along with our graded answer sheet. I suppose it's so we don't share them with others who still have to take the test. But by the time we get them back, the fun discussions will be over.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
For a response to: "Specifically 16 and 93?"
I couldn't find 16. But, I'd not call a T. So I put False. Any ideas of where this case would be found? And 93, rule 3-3-4, says the player directed to leave cannot reenter until the next dead ball. There is no reference that they can use a time out to keep this player in. see also rule 3-4-15 I only had five diff than you, Joe: 47 79 81 93 98 ..and on 79 and 81, I think you were right (after further review). we all argued 98. but its word for word in case book 9-7-2 that u can't have a 3sec call during an interrptd dribble. good luck all
__________________
"Have you ever heard of the 5-pt play--a multiple foul on a 3-pt try that goes?" LoL |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Question 98 is true in fact that question has appeared on previous tests.
Help with #47, why is this false? As for #63, violations occur following resumption of play procedure, not technicals. "The procedure results in a violation instead of a technical foul for initial delay in specific situations." Rule 4-37, page 38 #81 is also false, it appeared on a previous test. |
|
|||
#47
For 47 it is false beacuse theplayer touched the RING and not the ball. The only time we can have BI with just touching the ring is if hte ring is pulled down and contacts the ball prior to returning to its original position. (rule 4-6)
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
B violates by not having a player in the space on the first throw. That's resuming play because that is the initial delay. When the space is still not occupied for the second throw, it's a T. 8-1-1c Following a violation by one or by both teams, if that team(s) continues to delay it is a technical foul. Once the first FT is shot, we are no longer under the RPP and it's a T. I may be wrong but I don't think the fact that A makes the first FT has any bearing. Quite honestly, I can find anything that addresses this. But I seem to remember a case play that said even though the FT is made, it's still considered a violation by B under this procedure. I agree that #81 is false. |
|
|||
Quote:
B violates by not having a player in the space on the first throw. That's resuming play because that is the initial delay. When the space is still not occupied for the second throw, it's a T. 8-1-1c Following a violation by one or by both teams, if that team(s) continues to delay it is a technical foul. Once the first FT is shot, we are no longer under the RPP and it's a T. I may be wrong but I don't think the fact that A makes the first FT has any bearing. Quite honestly, I can find anything that addresses this. But I seem to remember a case play that said even though the FT is made, it's still considered a violation by B under this procedure. [/B][/QUOTE] I hate to bring this up again but going over my part 2 test got me thinking... Everything that has been said before about the situation is correct. Here's where I'm struggling: Under Resuming Play, B violates by not having two players in the first spaces. However, with the successful FT attempt, the violation goes unpenalized. Considering the fact that the violation went unpenalized should it be a T? Has anyone posed this question to their state interpreter or has anyone received a definitive answer from the NFHS or their state association?
__________________
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time rewarding and maddening-it is without a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented." Arnold Palmer |
|
|||
Quote:
If there's another throw, the procedure repeats -- again, a violation for B to not be in the bottom two spots. |
|
|||
Quote:
[Edited by whistleone on Dec 17th, 2003 at 04:33 PM]
__________________
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time rewarding and maddening-it is without a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented." Arnold Palmer |
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|