The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 08:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Saw this on another site, do any of you who took the test last night differ on many of these? Specifically 16 and 93?

1 T
3-4 T
6-9 T
11-14 T
17-21 T
23-24 T
26-27 T
29-30 T
32-35 T
37 T
41 T
45-47 T
50-51 T
53-55 T
59 T
62 T
64 T
66-68 T
71 T
73-74 T
76 T
78-80 T
83-84 T
86-89 T
91-93 T
97-98 T

all numbers not listed are false.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 199
Send a message via AIM to CYO Butch
Question Where can I find the questions to review?

As an outsider to your profession, I am still interested in learning as much as I can about officiating. Where can I find the questions from this year's exam?
__________________
It is hard enough to remember my opinions, without also remembering my reasons for them!
- Friedrich Nietzsche -
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Philo, IL "Center of the Universe"
Posts: 127
Does anyone have the test they could fax me? I like to use the test to study. If so, please e-mail me. [email protected] or fax 217-586-8277.

[Edited by kenref1 on Dec 9th, 2003 at 09:17 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Ugh! They made us turn in our test sheet along with our answer sheet. Apparently they'll mail them back to us along with our graded answer sheet. I suppose it's so we don't share them with others who still have to take the test. But by the time we get them back, the fun discussions will be over.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 93
Send a message via Yahoo to zebracz
Post

For a response to: "Specifically 16 and 93?"

I couldn't find 16. But, I'd not call a T. So I put False. Any ideas of where this case would be found?

And 93, rule 3-3-4, says the player directed to leave cannot reenter until the next dead ball. There is no reference that they can use a time out to keep this player in. see also rule 3-4-15

I only had five diff than you, Joe:

47 79 81 93 98

..and on 79 and 81, I think you were right (after further review).

we all argued 98. but its word for word in case book 9-7-2 that u can't have a 3sec call during an interrptd dribble.

good luck all
__________________
"Have you ever heard of the 5-pt play--a multiple foul on a 3-pt try that goes?" LoL
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
#16 is false. You do not charge the team with a T.

#93 was a source of controversy. I expect it to be thrown out in my state. I answered true.

#47 is false.

#63 is true.

#79 is false.

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by zebracz
we all argued 98. but its word for word in case book 9-7-2 that u can't have a 3sec call during an interrptd dribble.
#98 is true. The rule was changed last year. See the rule book for 9-7-2. Case play 9.7.2 has not been changed since last year's rule change.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 11:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Question 98 is true in fact that question has appeared on previous tests.

Help with #47, why is this false?

As for #63, violations occur following resumption of play procedure, not technicals. "The procedure results in a violation instead of a technical foul for initial delay in specific situations." Rule 4-37, page 38

#81 is also false, it appeared on a previous test.

Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 12:24pm
If you need me, text me!
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ocean City, MD
Posts: 137
#47

For 47 it is false beacuse theplayer touched the RING and not the ball. The only time we can have BI with just touching the ring is if hte ring is pulled down and contacts the ball prior to returning to its original position. (rule 4-6)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 09, 2003, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by JoeP
Help with #47, why is this false?
When the ball is in the IMAGINARY cylinder, it's BI if a player touches the ball. It is not BI if the player touches the ring or basket, unless the ball is in the ring or basket.

Quote:
As for #63, violations occur following resumption of play procedure, not technicals. "The procedure results in a violation instead of a technical foul for initial delay in specific situations." Rule 4-37, page 38
Here's my thought process.

B violates by not having a player in the space on the first throw. That's resuming play because that is the initial delay. When the space is still not occupied for the second throw, it's a T.

8-1-1c
Following a violation by one or by both teams, if that team(s) continues to delay it is a technical foul.

Once the first FT is shot, we are no longer under the RPP and it's a T.

I may be wrong but I don't think the fact that A makes the first FT has any bearing. Quite honestly, I can find anything that addresses this. But I seem to remember a case play that said even though the FT is made, it's still considered a violation by B under this procedure.

I agree that #81 is false.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 17, 2003, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 248
Quote:
As for #63, violations occur following resumption of play procedure, not technicals. "The procedure results in a violation instead of a technical foul for initial delay in specific situations." Rule 4-37, page 38
Here's my thought process.

B violates by not having a player in the space on the first throw. That's resuming play because that is the initial delay. When the space is still not occupied for the second throw, it's a T.

8-1-1c
Following a violation by one or by both teams, if that team(s) continues to delay it is a technical foul.

Once the first FT is shot, we are no longer under the RPP and it's a T.

I may be wrong but I don't think the fact that A makes the first FT has any bearing. Quite honestly, I can find anything that addresses this. But I seem to remember a case play that said even though the FT is made, it's still considered a violation by B under this procedure.

[/B][/QUOTE]
I hate to bring this up again but going over my part 2 test got me thinking...
Everything that has been said before about the situation is correct. Here's where I'm struggling: Under Resuming Play, B violates by not having two players in the first spaces. However, with the successful FT attempt, the violation goes unpenalized. Considering the fact that the violation went unpenalized should it be a T?

Has anyone posed this question to their state interpreter or has anyone received a definitive answer from the NFHS or their state association?
__________________
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated.
It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect.
It is at the same time rewarding and maddening-it is without
a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented."
Arnold Palmer
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 17, 2003, 02:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,105
Quote:
Originally posted by whistleone
I hate to bring this up again but going over my part 2 test got me thinking...
Everything that has been said before about the situation is correct. Here's where I'm struggling: Under Resuming Play, B violates by not having two players in the first spaces. However, with the successful FT attempt, the violation goes unpenalized. Considering the fact that the violation went unpenalized should it be a T?

Has anyone posed this question to their state interpreter or has anyone received a definitive answer from the NFHS or their state association?
No. It's not "a violation if the FT is missed; a T if the FT is made." If that were the case, A would intentionally miss the FT. They lose that point, but get the potential for two more, plus the ball.

If there's another throw, the procedure repeats -- again, a violation for B to not be in the bottom two spots.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 17, 2003, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 37
Send a message via Yahoo to rob.wilson
Wink

I put 16 as false and 93 as true. Comments are welcome. By the way, they took up our tests also and said they would mail them too us. But they didnt do it in the part one test.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 17, 2003, 02:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally posted by rob.wilson
I put 16 as false and 93 as true. Comments are welcome. By the way, they took up our tests also and said they would mail them too us. But they didnt do it in the part one test.
93 is false. Rule 3 Section 3 Art. 4 "A player who has been replaced, or directed to leave the game shall not re-enter before the next opportunity to substitute after the clock has been properly started following his/her replacement." It's not a buy-in situation like a bleeding player is.

[Edited by whistleone on Dec 17th, 2003 at 04:33 PM]
__________________
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated.
It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect.
It is at the same time rewarding and maddening-it is without
a doubt the greatest game mankind has ever invented."
Arnold Palmer
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 17, 2003, 04:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by whistleone
Quote:
Originally posted by rob.wilson
I put 16 as false and 93 as true. Comments are welcome. By the way, they took up our tests also and said they would mail them too us. But they didnt do it in the part one test.
93 is false. Rule 3 Section 3 Art. 4 "A player who has been replaces, or directed to leave the game shall not re-enter before the next opportunity to substitute after the clock has been properly started following his/her replacement." It's not a buy-in situation like a bleeding player is.
The question doesn't say that he's already been directed to leave the game. Comparing it to the rule, it's poorly worded.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1