Quote:
Originally posted by whistleone
I hate to bring this up again but going over my part 2 test got me thinking...
Everything that has been said before about the situation is correct. Here's where I'm struggling: Under Resuming Play, B violates by not having two players in the first spaces. However, with the successful FT attempt, the violation goes unpenalized. Considering the fact that the violation went unpenalized should it be a T?
Has anyone posed this question to their state interpreter or has anyone received a definitive answer from the NFHS or their state association?
|
No. It's not "a violation if the FT is missed; a T if the FT is made." If that were the case, A would intentionally miss the FT. They lose that point, but get the potential for two more, plus the ball.
If there's another throw, the procedure repeats -- again, a violation for B to not be in the bottom two spots.
Wed Dec 17, 2003, 02:25pm
Threaded Mode
