|
Tue Nov 25, 2003, 08:50pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It will cut off your vision because the area inside the arc is now the Lead's and if you "square up" to a play in this area who will be watching the weakside/paint while you are transferring responsibility? Bob, this shouldn't happen in a 3-man game because when the lead and trail should be connected by an imaginary rope, when the lead goes the trail comes down so you will have two C's for a short time. The new C now has the weak side. Who watches this weak side while the trail has the ball and you are squaring up to a play near the arc in a two man game? If it is body language then you are using your body. To maintain your field of vision you would have to be near the sideline so you can still see back into the paint. Instead of me explaining what I mean by squaring up why doesn't someone explain it to me how all of this can happen while someone still watches the paint/weak side? 
|
|
Wed Nov 26, 2003, 01:43am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Okay, so here I am at Lead, minding my own business in my primary, with Trail over there on the far side of the paint, above the arc. Now, I see that the ball has dropped down below the arc, and there's a rough pair of post playyers, working for position. But I've got two pairs over here on my side too. What am I supposed to do? Last year, I was supposed to slide across but looking at an angle back across the paint, seeing these post players on "strong side" but still keeping the other two pair in my line of sight, just in case. This year, from asking various people this question, it appears that we are supposed to "square up" to take the ball and the competitive match-up, and release the weak side players to Trail, who has to adjust her position accordingly. I don't like it. But then, I don't like the little skip step that so many boys take right before the shot, which ought to be called a travel, and absolutely never is. When I'm God, things are going to be different around here!!
|
|
Wed Nov 26, 2003, 01:56am
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove
|
|
Wed Nov 26, 2003, 02:04am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Wed Nov 26, 2003, 08:17am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That said, you can't watch everything all the time. If I'm going across, it's because I deem whatever is on that side to be "more important" than whatever is on this side. And if / when I pick up the ball it takes T a second to find the competitive matchup back on the other side, so be it.
|
|
Wed Nov 26, 2003, 10:53am
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is obviously just my opinion, but some of you have made this way more complicated than it really is. First of all, just to be completely clear, when I say "squaring up" it means "the official has his/her shoulders parallel to the boundary line". Until this thread, that's the only definition of "squaring up" I've ever heard, and so that's how I'm going to be using it. Ok, technical terms are out of the way, so. . .
In my experience, the decision for the Lead to go ball side is a fairly easy one. There's only two reasons to for the Lead to go ball side in a 2-whistle game: 1) The ball has been passed into the low-post, or is very likely about to passed into the low-post; or 2) There are two or more players banging for position on the strong side, and there is nobody banging for position on the weak side. That's it. If neither of those things is true, then stay put. If the ball comes below the FT line in a 1-on-1 situation, then stay put. It's the Trail's primary anyway. Let the Trail take it all the way to the basket. Now, once you go ball side, you are responsible for everything inside the 3-point arc and below the FT line extended (that's a change this year). So forget about squaring up. Yes, that means that you may have the ball and the bodies in the post, but there is no reason for you to turn your body. Officiate this play exactly as if you were on your "normal" side of the court. Keep yourself angled in toward the lane area. If the play moves toward the 3-point arc, then you move toward the 3-point arc; but stay angled toward the lane. Mirror the movement of the ball. As to the Trail's responsibility when the Lead comes ball side, the Trail has everything that the Lead doesn't have. So if the Lead came ballside to officiate banging bodies, but the ball is still above the FT line, then the Trail has the ball. If the Lead came ball side to take the entry pass to the post, then the Trail has the other players. Once on the court, this should not need to be communicated. In pre-game, it should be made clear that when the Lead comes across, s/he's either going to have the ball or not; in either case, the Trail has everything else. Again, just my opinion. Keep it simple.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
|
|
Thu Nov 27, 2003, 07:56pm
|
|||
|
|||
Chuck, where have you been all of these pages? I totally, totally agree with what you are saying. If you look at this entire thread you will see I said some of the same things. I think we could work together on this and be on one accord!
I hope what I think is going to happen doesn't happen...........................................
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
