The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 12, 2020, 10:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 528
Illinois-Mizzou flagrant foul

45 seconds left. Flagrant 1 called on Illinois. I don't know NCAA rules, but in HS, this would be nothing, at least in my game.

If JRut could clip it and the NCAAM guys could weigh in, I'd be interested in your opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 03:48pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODog View Post
45 seconds left. Flagrant 1 called on Illinois. I don't know NCAA rules, but in HS, this would be nothing, at least in my game.

If JRut could clip it and the NCAAM guys could weigh in, I'd be interested in your opinions.

I have not looked at the game. I am assuming that is 45 seconds in the second half correct?

Also, the F1 rule is basically the same in practice as the Intentional Foul rules with exceptions to some standards for elbow plays. I will look at the play and get put it up if I got something.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 05:43pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463


Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 06:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
There is a problem with the rule for a monitor review in a case such as this, namely that the basket which the offending player/team scored still counts!

If the monitor review results in a foul being charged to the scoring team during that offensive possession (prior to when the goal was made), then the goal should be canceled.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 06:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Question for our current NCAAM officials:
During a monitor review such as this one can the officials only charge an F1 or F2 or do they have the option to charge a common foul which would be a team control foul in this instance? (Or a PC if the situation warranted it. For example, the post player in this video had already caught the pass and then this contact occurred.)

In an NFHS game, I would call a team control foul.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 07:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
That isn't even foul.

The defender reacted BEFORE the hand got there. And the hand got there because he (the defender) pulled it there.

Academy Award Nomination there!!!
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 13, 2020, 08:52pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Question for our current NCAAM officials:
During a monitor review such as this one can the officials only charge an F1 or F2 or do they have the option to charge a common foul which would be a team control foul in this instance? (Or a PC if the situation warranted it. For example, the post player in this video had already caught the pass and then this contact occurred.)

In an NFHS game, I would call a team control foul.
If a foul is whistled, then any type of fouls can be called. If there was no whistle for a foul on the play, then you can only come back from the monitor with nothing, F1, or F2.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 02:12am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
That isn't even foul.

The defender reacted BEFORE the hand got there. And the hand got there because he (the defender) pulled it there.

Academy Award Nomination there!!!
I think this is a foul, but not an F1 IMO. The use of his arm has been seen as illegal and as he extends his arms. Now the antics by the defender certainly was overplayed.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 04:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I think this is a foul, but not an F1 IMO. The use of his arm has been seen as illegal and as he extends his arms. Now the antics by the defender certainly was overplayed.

Peace
I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 09:26am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.
I can see that argument. Depends on whether or not the initial extension of the offensive player is continue a ward-off or not.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 09:38am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I see it more like a hook and hold by the defender pulling the offensive player's arm into his own face....making it look like the offensive player fouled.
Neither post player can extend their arms and it was said this is a foul. That to me was missed or should have been called based on the videos and explanation from JD and the NCAA on the matter.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 09:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
Posts: 107
Did I miss something?

It looked to me, watching the game, that they put the wrong player on the freethrow line after the monitor review.

Are the free throw trys awarded to the fouled player, or are these like techical fouls where any player can shoot them?
__________________
If it's not one thing -- it's your Mother.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 10:06am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by LSams View Post
Did I miss something?

It looked to me, watching the game, that they put the wrong player on the freethrow line after the monitor review.

Are the free throw trys awarded to the fouled player, or are these like techical fouls where any player can shoot them?
If the player is considered injured and it is a Flagrant Foul, then the head coach of the offended player can choose who they want to shoot the FTs. So if the player did not stay in the game, anyone can shoot the FT in NCAA Men's rules.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 11:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Philadelphia, Ohio
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
If the player is considered injured and it is a Flagrant Foul, then the head coach of the offended player can choose who they want to shoot the FTs. So if the player did not stay in the game, anyone can shoot the FT in NCAA Men's rules.

Peace
Thanks!
__________________
If it's not one thing -- it's your Mother.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 14, 2020, 08:55pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
If the player is considered injured and it is a Flagrant Foul, then the head coach of the offended player can choose who they want to shoot the FTs. So if the player did not stay in the game, anyone can shoot the FT in NCAA Men's rules.



Peace
The injured player doesn't even have to leave the game. He can just be too injured to shoot the free throws. It happened in the very first big game of the season when they made the rule change a few years ago in a game between I think Kansas and Kentucky.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First Flagrant--Illinois guys help stiffler3492 Basketball 2 Sat Feb 19, 2011 02:19pm
Mizzou - Illinois eyezen Basketball 13 Thu Dec 23, 2010 09:41am
flagrant foul/flagrant technical splitveer Basketball 6 Tue Feb 16, 2010 01:05pm
UW-Milwaukee/Illinois Intentional Foul no-call gostars Basketball 15 Fri Mar 25, 2005 05:22pm
Mizzou/Syracuse game, Intentional foul. Jerry Blum Basketball 5 Wed Jan 14, 2004 10:54am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1