Undergarments

[Pantherdreams]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Some "famous" player does it, so now it's the cool trend.

NCAAW: a player can wear just one sleeve, or sleeves of different lengths, but if the player is wearing tights, the legs must be the same length.

Since I've been that guy on like 2 other posts today. . .

Tights must be the same length or must be worn at same length.

Ie. Can we have tights that are calf length on both legs but one is bunch up to knee and other is taunt on calf? Conversely, can we have tights that are two different lengths but both are being worn to same length?

Are we administrating the length of the tights or the length at which the tights are being worn and which has to the same.

[Kansas Ref]

Mr. Panther: I feel your pain on being a "traffic cop" and trying to be diligent and I respect you for your kind efforts; as for me, if the "Color requirements" of undergarments pass, then I don't worry about the "length aspects. You've got bigger fish to fry...

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Kansas Ref

Mr. Panther: I feel your pain on being a "traffic cop" and trying to be diligent and I respect you for your kind efforts; as for me, if the "Color requirements" of undergarments pass, then I don't worry about the "length aspects. You've got bigger fish to fry...

Well in NFHS the length aspect is irrelevant.

In NCAA-M it's a new rule this year and in my college games, it's expected that we will enforce it.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Pantherdreams

Since I've been that guy on like 2 other posts today. . .

Tights must be the same length or must be worn at same length.

Ie. Can we have tights that are calf length on both legs but one is bunch up to knee and other is taunt on calf? Conversely, can we have tights that are two different lengths but both are being worn to same length?

Are we administrating the length of the tights or the length at which the tights are being worn and which has to the same.

Treat it just as you'd treat the undershirt sleeves.