Taunting ...
Quote:
Fighting includes, but is not limited to combative acts such as: ART. 1 An attempt to strike, punch or kick by using a fist, hands, arms, legs or feet regardless of whether contact is made. ART. 2 An attempt to instigate a fight by committing an unsporting act that causes a person to retaliate by fighting. Sidebar question: "Retaliate by fighting". Must the retaliation be physical, or can it be a retaliatory taunt, to be considered part of a fight? 10-4-6 A player shall not: Commit an unsporting foul. This includes, but is not limited to, acts or conduct such as: a. Disrespectfully addressing or contacting an official or gesturing in such a manner as to indicate resentment. b. Using profane or inappropriate language or obscene gestures. c. Baiting or taunting an opponent. NOTE: The NFHS disapproves of any form of taunting which is intended or designed to embarrass, ridicule or demean others under any circumstances. Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. is correct (for a change), by NFHS rule, the taunt only becomes part of a fight if there is retaliation. Quote:
|
Quote:
I am backkkkkk...thanks for missing me Billy Mac;) I think the distinction I was looking for was Flagrant Technical and Flagrant Personal foul and who can shoot the FT and where is the ball put in play. I did not make that clear at all in the OP:confused: |
Welcome Back, And Yes I Missed You ...
Quote:
The question is about personal fouls versus technical fouls, live ball and dead ball intentional fouls, not about different types of technical fouls (flagrant for fighting versus flagrant for something else). It may take two to Tango, it only takes one to fight. https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.S...=0&w=218&h=175 |
Quote:
P -- the player fouled must shoot; the throw-in is at the spot closest to the foul. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03am. |