![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Definitely possible......are you butthurt about something?
When is the last time an assignor (or coach, partner, player or fan) asked you about your test score? My 100% score on a written test is no assurance I can referee effectively. People who fixate on test scores usually suffer from other major issues that preclude advancement and success.
__________________
Prettys Womans in your city Last edited by justacoach; Fri Sep 13, 2019 at 12:23pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
...if you read the prelude to my query you would see that it has Nothing to do with 'ego' or anything, it's just a simple question that addresses the impossibility of said score based on human error in the writing of said testing document.We all know that a test score has no bearing on officiating ability...but that's not the point. For example there are folks who pass the "Kansas state driving test" with a 100% who cause more accidents than others who score lower. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW, I have Freud genes in my bloodline
__________________
Prettys Womans in your city |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
And he did have a "Why?" in there... Do any associations represented on here still use the test scores for ranking purposes? I believe the local association here still does. |
|
|||
|
We use test scores, but we use our own test, not the NFHS test.
|
|
|||
|
Well if it makes anyone feel better, we take a state-issued test in Illinois and in Indiana we take the NF test. The Illinois test is like 25 questions out of anywhere from 60-70 tests.
I have gotten 100 a few times on the Illinois test. The last two years that I have taken the NF/Indiana test, I always miss one or two questions. Either way I only care about getting the most points allowed. I take no satisfaction in getting 100 or 96% if the result is the same. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
|
I have over twenty years as a HS basketball official.
I have probably scored 100% on the NFHS Part 1 exam 7 or 8 times. Most of the time my score comes out around 98% due to the test-writing errors mentioned by the OP. The only way to deal with this is experience. Over the years one learns what the test-writer is aiming for with certain questions. Also, if your area issues an answer key afterward (they are also posted online by several groups), you can read through those and learn the intent of many of the strange test questions. Going forward, you will notice that several of the questions repeat and if you have a decent memory you can easily get them correct. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" | teebob21 | Softball | 15 | Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm |
| Yet another "Why I Hate Test Questions" post... | PSidbury | Basketball | 24 | Thu Dec 06, 2012 01:46am |
| NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology | Duffman | Basketball | 17 | Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm |
| Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? | fiasco | Basketball | 46 | Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |