UConn-Tulsa: Two Coach Ejections

[jeremy341a]

Article on it

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...ke/2599373002/

[#olderthanilook]

Hurley said he felt "...as though that situation escalated because of the officials and the way they handled the situation." after the first technical fouls were issued.

It doesn't look like it to me.

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

Hurley said he felt "...as though that situation escalated because of the officials and the way they handled the situation." after the first technical fouls were issued.

Of course he did.

When's the last time these coaches ever publicly took accountability for their behavior rather than passing the buck to someone else?

[JRutledge]

Funny, one of my supervisors is on this game. I wonder if we will hear the back story later.

Peace

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Of course he did.

When's the last time these coaches ever publicly took accountability for their behavior rather than passing the buck to someone else?

heh...yep. It's all right there on film, coaches.

I do hope we get some of that back story from Rut's sup later, too.

[Altor]

Originally Posted by #olderthanilook

Hurley said he felt "...as though that situation escalated because of the officials and the way they handled the situation." after the first technical fouls were issued.

It doesn't look like it to me.

So, after being warned by one official and then receiving technical fouls by a second, the situation escalated because the officials didn't do their job by doing what exactly? Should they have duct taped your mouths shut to keep you in the game?

[#olderthanilook]

Originally Posted by Altor

So, after being warned by one official and then receiving technical fouls by a second, the situation escalated because the officials didn't do their job by doing what exactly? Should they have duct taped your mouths shut to keep you in the game?

It's like coaches saying a player got hurt/could've got hurt because the officials didn't do their job. Well, we engage in good communication with players and call fouls. What else are we supposed to do to ensure Rusty doesn't hurt Jimmy? Run between them during a drive to the basket and make sure we keep them separated?

Good grief.

At some point coaches (and players) have to take responsibility for what they *can* control....and that is their mouths and professional candor.

[so cal lurker]

Will they both get an extra suspension for not leaving when ejected?

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by so cal lurker

Will they both get an extra suspension for not leaving when ejected?

Coaches rarely get suspended at that level for ejections, even if they don't "leave in a timely manner" like the NBA requires.

[thedewed]

shocker, I see this differently than the rest of you. one T is ok, after that the young guy overreacted rather than taking stock of what was happening. if these 2 coaches that knew each other were coming at each other with a hand out, let the moment happen. be human. It actually would have been a nice moment. I think Pat got it. The 2nd official overl-reacted and created a cluster. that people management separates good officials from great officials. it isn't us vs. them. help them settle down, and if they want to shake hands, let them. don't cite 'out of the coaching box' for a 2nd tech in that situation. teaching moment that is lost on the posters that have weighed in so far.

[HokiePaul]

Originally Posted by Altor

So, after being warned by one official and then receiving technical fouls by a second, the situation escalated because the officials didn't do their job by doing what exactly? Should they have duct taped your mouths shut to keep you in the game?

I think the first official was issuing a double technical foul, not a warning. My understanding was that the disqualification was for 2 technical. Unless they had one each from earlier.

My only question on this was did the second official realize that his partner had given a technical already. The mechanics used by the first official were a little odd as he appeared to give the double foul signal, but not the "T" signal.

Originally Posted by HokiePaul

I think the first official was issuing a double technical foul, not a warning. My understanding was that the disqualification was for 2 technical. Unless they had one each from earlier.

My only question on this was did the second official realize that his partner had given a technical already. The mechanics used by the first official were a little odd as he appeared to give the double foul signal, but not the "T" signal.

Marques Pettigrew gave double warning, then Pat Adams gave double T, then Marques gave second double T and ejected both coaches, pretty simple to understand.

[HokiePaul]

Originally Posted by AremRed

Marques Pettigrew gave double warning, then Pat Adams gave double T, then Marques gave second double T and ejected both coaches, pretty simple to understand.

Well I don't know the officials names, but I guess I missed the second technical if the first official issued a warning. Perhaps the call for the second T didn't occur on camera