![]() |
|
|||
NCAA 9-3-1 interpretation assistance
Early in the 2nd half of last week's Kentucky v Vanderbilt game.
Kentucky in live possession of the ball, a Kentucky player intentionally ran out of bounds. The player dribbling the ball waited until the Kentucky player established position on the court, and passed it to him. Violation of 9-3-1 or no? Was called a violation on the floor. The rule states it is a violation when a player "steps out of bounds under his own volition and then becomes the first player to touch the ball after returning to the playing court." Is the intent of the rule to prevent this, or to prevent a player from having possession himself, going out of bounds with nobody else touching the ball, returning to the court and (re)obtaining possession? Or is it to prevent both situations? Thanks for your thoughts. Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New "Two Second Pause" Pitching Interpretation (NCAA) | teebob21 | Softball | 20 | Wed Sep 26, 2018 10:07pm |
NCAA running lane interpretation | oldadmark | Softball | 6 | Sun May 05, 2013 10:12pm |
NCAA Rule 10, Section 1, Art. 2 interpretation | drews135 | Basketball | 4 | Tue Oct 20, 2009 01:39pm |
Silly NCAA runner assistance rule... | Dakota | Softball | 70 | Fri May 08, 2009 08:44am |
NCAA rule interpretation | Jorge Delgado | Football | 2 | Tue Jul 10, 2001 12:01pm |