|
|||
Block or PC?
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words". Last edited by thumpferee; Tue Dec 18, 2018 at 09:10am. |
|
|||
Lol. Look again
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words". |
|
|||
Block then 2 sets of double T's
1 on the 2 involved in the original call 1 on the tall and short guy I know they went PC probably because the armbar extended but that's a normal reaction when a defender just runs into you like that.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Block, but I only have two T's -- the original blue player, then the white player who rushes in to "help" his teammate
|
|
|||
Bob you don't think the square up of tall and short in that type of environment was T worthy? Also a guess, but they weren't talking about the weather.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
I think it is most definitely T worthy. I can't really think of a good reason why it wouldn't be. |
|
|||
I'm not going to watch the rest of the game to get context but I am assuming based on the reaction to the forearm that things have been building in this game. Using my FIBA vernacular:
Step 1 - Block on defender Step 2 - Unsportsmanlike on offensive player for shove. Step 3 - Double Tech's on the original offenders Step 4 - Double Tech's on on the smash brothers squaring off up stage.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
|||
Quote:
Of course, if words are exchanged, that might lead to a T. |
|
|||
Block 100%.
Then 2 sets of double Ts. And what to make of the kid waiving his arms inciting the crowd? Not sure if that is something to penalize, but I don't like it. Edit to add: They ejected the kid that got fouled in the first place!? I assume they ejected the kid that did the fouling too? How 10 Blue gets out of that without a tech is interesting. Last edited by ballgame99; Tue Dec 18, 2018 at 10:34am. |
|
|||
Quote:
I would have been a lil more lenient. I had someone tell me they would shoot the FT's for bothe since they weren't simultaneous techs. Is there a ruling that would justify that? Also, I watched the game and there was no other situations that warranted the reactions shown. Actually it was kinda boring and unemotional. Until then.
__________________
"A picture is worth a thousand words". |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
A lot going on here. Here's what I have with the luxury of watching it a half dozen times on replay:
Blue 32 - blocking foul (first contact, before W21's extended arm) Blue 32 - flagrant tech for fighting White 21 - flagrant tech for fighting White 24 - technical foul - unsporting (clapping at opponent, inciting the crowd) Blue 10 - flagrant technical - fighting White 23 - unsure. I can't see his mouth moving, his arms stay straight down and his side and his body language is hard to interpret From there...wow.... Shoot FTs if White is in team bonus Flagrant T's B32/W21 offset - no FTs Blue - shoot FTs for W24 unsporting tech foul White - shoot FTs for B10 flagrant tech foul White ball at mid court after FTs Both coaches retain coaching box privileges since no bench personnel are involved in the festivities??? Am I close? |
|
|||
Even if you were clever with the rules, you still shouldn't shoot since the rules say "approximately". That is approximate to anyone that is reasonable.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FG block | phansen | Football | 2 | Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:34am |
Cut block | hawkishowl20 | Football | 20 | Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:38pm |
Block or not? | Sven | Basketball | 4 | Sat Mar 19, 2005 11:17pm |
difference between cut block and chop block | ase | Football | 7 | Mon Nov 29, 2004 11:23am |
PC or Block | RecRef | Basketball | 3 | Thu Dec 06, 2001 09:31am |