We agree in this play there was a foul on the try but there was not an airborne shooter since the try was never released.
[/B][/QUOTE]No, we don't agree.There was no foul on the try because the horn ended the try, and the foul occurred after the try so it is ignored.

Quit trying to confuse us. I hate when people do that!

http://www.uselessgraphics.com/laurelhardy.gif

Just to clear things up, JR, are you the pot. . . or the kettle? :)

No, we don't agree.There was no foul on the try because the horn ended the try, and the foul occurred after the try so it is ignored.

Quit trying to confuse us. I hate when people do that!

http://www.uselessgraphics.com/laurelhardy.gif [/B][/QUOTE]

Oops you're right. Got it jumbled up - jump foul horn release is what I was thinking. Jump horn foul release is no foul.

I think we do agree. I was referring to my third case, jump, foul, horn, release - it is a foul in the act because airborn shooter is not the relevant issue - the relevant issue is that it was a foul before the horn and the foul was on somebody in the act of shooting.

On the other case, we also agree - jump horn, foul, release - game over.