![]() |
Travel, block, or nada?
Loose ball on the floor. A-1 secures the ball in his backcourt while standing up, and tries to move upcourt, but trips over B-2, lying prone in front of him. A-1 manages to get his non-pivot foot over B-2, and just as A-1 gets his pivot foot over B-2 and setting it down, he releases a successful pass to A-3.
*Travel on A-1? *Blocking foul on B-2? *Nothing, play it on? |
Show me a video.
Let's assume that B-2 is simply holding a spot on the floor. It's traveling if the pivot foot returns to the floor before the pass and is not if it doesn't. What's confusing about that? |
Quote:
|
Sounds like a blocking foul on B2.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A trip is a deliberate act that in this scenario would be an intentional foul. |
Block in NCAAW (assuming A1 was affected by B2).
B2 is legal in FED, so the pivot foot actions determine travel or not. (Edited to correct my original posting having the rulings reversed) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's unclear in the OP. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Let's Go To The Videotape ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I appreciate the thoughts. This happened last night, and I went with option C, played it on.
My thought process: It could not be a travel (despite what Coach B wanted at that moment). The interpretation I understand is someone lying on the floor is not entitled to that spot, so any contact that causes what would be a travel would have to be a foul. However, since A-1 got a clean pass upcourt to a teammate, I felt it best to pass on the contact. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46pm. |