Two Blocked Shots - Same player

[JRutledge]

Peace

[bob jenkins]

1) Foul. Too much body enabled the block,

2) Legal. Defender jumped vertically

[jTheUmp]

1) Foul. Defender jumps forward into the shooter and makes contact with the body before contacting the ball. But I can see how the L missed this based on his angle.

2) No foul... you could argue that the defender ever established LGP, but that's a weak argument on this particular play.

Play 1: No foul

Play 2: No foul

[Camron Rust]

Play 1. Foul. Significant body contact before getting to the ball.

Play 2. Foul. No LGP, which means the player doesn't have the rights of jumping. Even if he did, he jumped across the airborne shooter's path, having started on the far side of the lane above the letter "A" and landing on the near side of the lane above above the middle/last letter "C" area. If he had jumped straight up, he would have landed in the same spot he start from.

[BryanV21]

1. From the side angle that we first get it looked like the defender was vertical, and the shooter fell due to the ball being blocked back into his hand. But seeing it from the baseline I see that the defender was not vertical, and his body was moving towards the shooter and contact is made. Blocking foul... two shots.

2. Clean. The defender was vertical, and the contact is all on the shooter for jumping forward into the defender.