The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
I thought #3 I might call IF. The rest.....not pretty in some cases but also not warranting of any additional penalty given the game situation and strategy IMHO.

I've said this before and will continue to say it until I'm convinced otherwise: I don't believe the committee and assignors are on the same page here. Assignors would usually prefer not to get phone calls. Calling the fouls exemplified in the videos as IFs would probably result in a lot of phone calls. Unlike the freedom of movement initiative a few years back, I don't feel like there's enough of a groundswell of support over changing the way we approach end of game situations so as to overcome officiating inertia.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2016 NCAA Rule Change: OBS - "About to Receive" vs. "In the act of Catching" teebob21 Softball 15 Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:16pm
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology Duffman Basketball 17 Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? fiasco Basketball 46 Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1