The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   6 on the Court -- unnoticed... (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/102845-6-court-unnoticed.html)

BigCat Sun Oct 29, 2017 12:55am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanV21 (Post 1010749)
I think BigCat is seeing the intention of the rule, but the wording is bad and can be interpreted how BillyMac is saying.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

I'm stretching it in this limited circumstance... so just dont let it happen....

BillyMac Sun Oct 29, 2017 12:57am

For Whom The Bell Tolls (Ernest Hemingway) ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 1010746)
This is called not following the rules and making up your own.

While the rule itself may not be as clear as we'd like it (definition of participate), Ms. Wynns interpretation (on court official must observe excess number of players on the court, during a live ball, penalized only if discovered while being violated) seems to be as clear as a bell. And I know not of a higher NFHS interpretative authority.

BigCat Sun Oct 29, 2017 01:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010753)
While the rule itself may not be as clear as we'd like it (definition of participate), Ms. Wynns interpretation (on court official must observe excess number of players on the court, during a live ball, penalized only if discovered while being violated) seems to be a clear as a bell. And I know not of a higher NFHS interpretative authority.

Yeah, you're right. I suppose if i let 6 players on the court and i cant figure it out without the scorer/timer getting me to stop the game and telling me.....then i probably deserve what happens next.... tell the opposing coach "i see 6 now...but i didnt then...so i cant penalize...". :) just dont let it happen..

BillyMac Sun Oct 29, 2017 06:27am

Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 1010747)
... after the ball was dead....and they're 6 players from one team still out there ... they are still there. I would penalize.

And according to Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor, you would be 100% wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 1010754)
"I see 6 now...but I didnt then...so I can't penalize...".

And according to Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor, you would be 100% correct.

BigCat Sun Oct 29, 2017 08:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010755)
And according to Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor, you would be 100% wrong.



And according to Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor, you would be 100% correct.

I acknowledged this in my previous post...but thx for pointing it out again..:)

BillyMac Sun Oct 29, 2017 08:23am

110% Correct ???
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 1010756)
I acknowledged this in my previous post...but thx for pointing it out again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010755)
And according to Theresia Wynns, NFHS Basketball Rules Editor, you would be 100% correct.

Nothing wrong with being 100% correct. Embrace it.

bob jenkins Mon Oct 30, 2017 08:10am

I hope that she puts the (wrong*, imo) interp someplace a little more official than "an interview in the IAABO sportorial"

* -- wrong, because a player can participate while the ball is dead after a made basket. Maybe it should be "while the ball is live or while the clock is (properly) running"

JRutledge Mon Oct 30, 2017 09:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1010774)
I hope that she puts the (wrong*, imo) interp someplace a little more official than "an interview in the IAABO sportorial"

This is about as bad as her sending an email response to a person and not addressing the issue that is being actually asked. Then putting no such interpretation out to back up that statement.

Peace

BillyMac Mon Oct 30, 2017 06:05pm

Be Careful What You Ask For, You May Get It ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jerkins (Post 1010774)
Maybe it should be while the ball is live or while the clock is (properly) running

That was my opinion way back at the beginning of this thread. At least we've got a NFHS interpretation, from no less than the head honcho, to put some form of closure to this debate. Some of us may not like the interpretation, but at least we have one.

BigCat Mon Oct 30, 2017 09:06pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010802)
That was my opinion way back at the beginning of this thread. At least we've got a NFHS interpretation, from no less than the head honcho, to put some form of closure to this debate. Some of us may not like the interpretation, but at least we have one.

No. She's wrong. You say stupid nfhs in so many places and want to accept this. Made basket, ball dead clock running.. player is participating. I'm guessing she was asked a question about 6 on floor, then one sneaks off, ball becomes dead with officials being clueless. Scorer tells them. Can't penalize there. She made a generalized statement which was too broad.

And Nevada rationalized it earlier citing the provision that a player who enters doesn't participate until ball becomes live. That is true. But once it does that player is participating even when made basket/ball dead. He isn't a participant and then cease to be every dead ball. Equally wrong.

BillyMac Tue Oct 31, 2017 05:57am

Opinions ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCat (Post 1010806)
She's wrong ... and (you) want to accept this.

I do not want to accept this (I lead the charge to expand the definition of participate), but until a new interpretation comes from the NFHS, it's the only choice I have, other than offer my own opinion, or to listen to opinions of other officials, but in both cases they're just opinions, opinions based on ambiguous rules, based on a nonexistent definition of participate.

BillyMac Tue Oct 31, 2017 06:34am

Dead Ball Period ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1010774)
Maybe it should be "while the ball is live or while the clock is (properly) running"

So there would be a difference between the charging of the technical foul during the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful field goal, and the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful free throw?

bob jenkins Tue Oct 31, 2017 07:37am

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010820)
So there would be a difference between the charging of the technical foul during the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful field goal, and the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful free throw?

Good point.

How about (and with just as little thought as before) "A player does not begin to participate until the ball is live. A player continues to participate until earliest of: (a) the ball becomes live after the player leaves the court (is replaced or sits on the bench), or (b) or the period ends and multiple players from either team have entered or left the court, or (c) a granted time out is reported to the table and the time out timer has (or should have) begun."

BillyMac Tue Oct 31, 2017 04:43pm

Always Listen To bob ...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 1010822)
How about "A player does not begin to participate until the ball is live. A player continues to participate until ...

Finish it anyway you want. Anything is better the definition of participating that we now have, which is nothing, zero, diddly squat, goose egg, zip, zilch, zippo, nill, naught ...

bucky Tue Oct 31, 2017 11:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyMac (Post 1010820)
So there would be a difference between the charging of the technical foul during the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful field goal, and the dead ball period immediately following the scoring of a successful free throw?

On a side note, some states have mercy rules whereby the clock is properly running during a dead ball.:eek:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1