NCAA Tournament Video Requests - Sunday March 19

[ODog]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Peace

In HS, this is not basket interference. This is a technical foul. Is the rule different in NCAAM?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Second half

1:56 block called

1:40-something foul called by C opposite side of court

1:01 designated spot violation and official gives travel mechanic

1. If this is the block in the middle of the FT lane against SC, then it was a wonderful call. The defender moved in late after the offensive player had become airborne.
Edit: Nope, just saw the video. That is the one on the endline. PC was the proper call imo. The play in thinking of occurred about a minute prior and was on a drive down the middle of the lane.

2. Tough to come that far in front of a partner for something that is debatable.

3. Surprisingly, Mike Reed is an extreme rules guy.

[Johnny Ringo]

Originally Posted by ODog

In HS, this is not basket interference. This is a technical foul. Is the rule different in NCAAM?

If you notice the C official he is making a signal for a technical foul.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by OKREF

UNC Arkansas. 48 seconds left in 2nd. No call on block/charge

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

TNT
North Carolina v Arkansas
About 45 seconds left
Block/charge/travel. #2v#2

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

25.2 remaining
Foul or vertical defenders

Originally Posted by just another ref

Arkansas/NC 2:15 of the second half. Is this not a travel you would call in a jr. high game? I thought I was seeing it called tighter this year, but......

Peace

[MechanicGuy]

Originally Posted by ODog

Did he? I was watching and thought I just saw him correctly whistle the violation and point to the end line. I know the announcers talked about "a travel" being called, but I guess I missed the travel signal being used.

He did it real briefly, and honestly looked like he didn't want to

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Second half

1:56 block called

Originally Posted by SC Official

1:40-something foul called by C opposite side of court

Originally Posted by SC Official

1:01 designated spot violation and official gives travel mechanic

Peace

Originally Posted by Johnny Ringo

If you notice the C official he is making a signal for a technical foul.

Are you sure about that?

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

3. Surprisingly, Mike Reed is an extreme rules guy.

Originally Posted by MechanicGuy

He did it real briefly, and honestly looked like he didn't want to

Yeah I think this play probably surprised him and he gave an abnormal signal cuz he didn't know how else to communicate it.

Also, what is up with Duke and throw-in violations??

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

PC foul 1:38 left URI/Oregon

Peace

[Camron Rust]

No. The defender leaned into the shooter's path after the shooter was airborne.

[ballgame99]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Peace

First one is a PC, or a travel, but definitely not nothing. Defender looks to establish LGP and is not coming forward. Then A1 travels.

Second play looks like a foul on both defenders, take your pick. Neither one maintains verticality. There's nothing wrong with a double whistle on that play in the middle of the lane, especially with two defenders converging on one shooter is there?

third play, is a travel in slow mo, but I certainly didn't raise an eyebrow to it live.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by ballgame99

Second play looks like a foul on both defenders, take your pick. Neither one maintains verticality. There's nothing wrong with a double whistle on that play in the middle of the lane, especially with two defenders converging on one shooter is there?

- Take your pick? Why not follow the rules and call a multiple foul? oh yea, see tagline.

1) I like hand check on initial dribble. OK, they don't call that so, I got a block on collision. (looks as if I am in minority on that)

2) Foul on double teaming defender. Arms are angled down creating initial contact.

3) Technical travel. L cannot see ball control(up top) and feet(below) in this case. T reffing passer/defender and screened.

[Dale3]

Originally Posted by ODog

In HS, this is not basket interference. This is a technical foul. Is the rule different in NCAAM?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Peace

Can someone confirm / deny that this was correctly ruled BI per NCAAM rules?

We seem to have agreement that in HS this is a Technical, not BI. And as Johnny Ringo points out, the C does appear to be signaling a T.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Dale3

We seem to have agreement that in HS this is a Technical, not BI.

NFHS Player Technical Foul: A player shall not: Illegally contact the backboard/ring by: Placing a hand on the backboard or ring to gain an advantage.

It's the "Ralph Sampson Rule".

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Dale3

Can someone confirm / deny that this was correctly ruled BI per NCAAM rules?

We seem to have agreement that in HS this is a Technical, not BI. And as Johnny Ringo points out, the C does appear to be signaling a T.

Same rule in both.