First Four Plays: Wednesday

[JRutledge]

Play #1:


Play #2:


Peace

[crosscountry55]

1: CC, but not because the screen was blind (it wasn't). Rather, it was because the screener did not stay within his vertical plane with a stance approximately shoulder width apart.

2: I liked the call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nevadaref]

UC Davis game: 2nd half about 18:30 left
Backcourt or not?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

UC Davis game: 2nd half about 18:30 left
Backcourt or not?

Do you mean the play with NC Central had the ball bounce around?

Peace

[JRutledge]

Is this the play?



Peace

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by crosscountry55

1: CC, but not because the screen was blind (it wasn't). Rather, it was because the screener did not stay within his vertical plane with a stance approximately shoulder width apart.

2: I liked the call.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#1, Agree.

#2, i could go either way on that....pc or no call. I think the defender aided in the movement in that direction...it wasn't all from the push. Since it didn't amount to anything, I would be OK with a pass.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Is this the play?



Peace

That was the play. It looked strange at full speed because it wasn't clear where the dribbler lost the ball.
I also will note that this is an interrupted dribble and the same player eventually recovered the ball without an intervening touch by another player. Hence, he did an excellent job of requesting a TO instead of dribbling again. I have to wonder if the violation would have been caught had he dribbled again.

[JRutledge]

That is good, I was only focusing on the BC violation portion. But that is a very good point about interrupted dribble. You are right, he did not dribble again.

Peace