Video Request: DPF + DTF

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by deecee

By rule the initial double foul should have been double dead ball contact T's. Although I think white is the offender here and red is pulled into the contact.

Why? It started while the ball was still live. I'm OK with a personal double.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Why? It started while the ball was still live. I'm OK with a personal double.

I disagree with this statement completely.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by deecee

I disagree with this statement completely.

Why, they were hooked up and starting to pull on each other before the ball was through the basket. It escalated after, but it certainty started before. In fact, they started smaller holds/pulls on each other with the ball still in the shooter's hands when the shooter was only half-way through the lane.

[deecee]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Why, they were hooked up and starting to pull on each other before the ball was through the basket. It escalated after, but it certainty started before. In fact, they started smaller holds/pulls on each other with the ball still in the shooter's hands when the shooter was only half-way through the lane.

Could be I see the contact for the call after the ball is through. I still don't know what red did (as white was hooking him) there, and then white goes after red (was something said? maybe). The whole set of events was started and accelerated by white.

I don't have a problem with a DPF called, as it's probably expected. However by rule, and the letter of the law, the contact happened when the ball was dead. In the end I think the red player got the short end of the stick.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by deecee

Could be I see the contact for the call after the ball is through. I still don't know what red did (as white was hooking him) there, and then white goes after red (was something said? maybe). The whole set of events was started and accelerated by white.

I don't have a problem with a DPF called, as it's probably expected. However by rule, and the letter of the law, the contact happened when the ball was dead. In the end I think the red player got the short end of the stick.

It has been discussed when contact started/occurred but not sure what that has to do with anything. Could say there was contact 5 minutes ago between the two. Aren't we really talking about when the official blew his whistle? And to me, he blew it when the ball was dead. I think he picked up the severest portion of the contact late and considered that the ball was still in the air/net and therefore reacted with the double foul mechanic. Or maybe he did see the contact when the ball was live but there was lag time until his whistle and he gave the double foul mechanic intentionally. He then approaches the players and signals the double T. Not enough info to critique to harshly. I would have liked to see either C or T come in there much quicker.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by bucky

It has been discussed when contact started/occurred but not sure what that has to do with anything. Could say there was contact 5 minutes ago between the two. Aren't we really talking about when the official blew his whistle? And to me, he blew it when the ball was dead. I think he picked up the severest portion of the contact late and considered that the ball was still in the air/net and therefore reacted with the double foul mechanic. Or maybe he did see the contact when the ball was live but there was lag time until his whistle and he gave the double foul mechanic intentionally. He then approaches the players and signals the double T. Not enough info to critique to harshly. I would have liked to see either C or T come in there much quicker.

No, it has nothing to do with when the whistle blows.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by Rich

No, it has nothing to do with when the whistle blows.

So, what is "it"?