View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 24, 2017, 04:57pm
crosscountry55 crosscountry55 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
I think you could justify it as either (personal or technical) because there was contact both before and after the ball became dead. Just because the whistle came after doesn't mean that the contact that triggered the call did. Or, perhaps the official saw the initial contact occurring before the ball became dead, was going to pass, but decided to call it after it escalated. He had a choice in determining what was the actual foul. In this case, I don't think he'd be wrong either way.
This is probably the truth according to Kelly Pfeifer.

Paradox: I feel that if I called this exact same scenario in the exact same manner at a college tryout camp, I wouldn't get hired. Why is that?
Reply With Quote