Blarge Question And NFHS Response

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Apples and Oranges.

Calling it a block due to RA is a different thing than two judging the same contact as a block and a charge. There is no conflict when the RA is the reason for the block.

His question was does that precedent, or concept, apply to the boundary line as well as the RA?

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Apples and Oranges.

Calling it a block due to RA is a different thing than two judging the same contact as a block and a charge. There is no conflict when the RA is the reason for the block.

Originally Posted by Adam

His question was does that precedent, or concept, apply to the boundary line as well as the RA?

Yes, the previous post had brought the situation for a block charge where the defender's foot is on the line. As Adam previously mentioned, it might not be good to use the same reasoning as the RA play, but I do still think its similar enough to justify making one call over the other.