Inbounds pass muffed into backcourt
I thought I recalled seeing this discussed here previously, but I've searched and can't find it.
NFHS Rules A1 is inbounding from the endline in his frontcourt. A2 is standing in the frontcourt near the division line. A2 jumps to catch the pass, and the ball goes off his fingertips and into the backcourt where A2 goes and retrieves it. Is this a violation?? Please cite rules or casebook plays. I know the reason for the correct ruling should center around control. |
No violation. The infamous rule 9 section 9 Backcourt article 3.
|
In order to have a backcourt violation, there have been player control inbounds. Until there is such, there is no team control (true team control). Without team control, there can be no backcourt violation.
See rule 4 and rule 9. ;) |
Four Elements ...
Quote:
when coming from a throw-in); the ball must have achieved frontcourt status; the team in team control must be the last to touch the ball before it goes into the backcourt; that same team must be the first to touch after the ball has been in the backcourt. During a throwin, even under a team’s own basket, if the throwin is deflected, tipped, or batted, by an offensive player in the frontcourt to an offensive player in the backcourt; or after a missed field goal attempt, or a missed foul shot attempt, if the ball is deflected, tipped, or batted, by an offensive player in the frontcourt to an offensive player in the backcourt; these are not a backcourt violations. |
Quote:
|
Had this play last night:
Team A is in their front court and has a pass deflected by team B. The tipped pass is headed toward team A back court. A2 jumps from front court and gains possession of the ball (in the air) and lands in teams A back court. Trail calls over and back and team A's coach (who has been excellent) wants an explanation. Partner explains; she left the air while still in her front court therefore she and the ball still had front court status. I initially thought - he's right, but now I think WE got it wrong. I'm thinking the tipped pass changes team control - therefore making A2 a defender - NFHS 9.9.3. Am I thinking correctly here? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Also, are you in the great (icy) state of Iowa as well? |
Thanks for all the responses. Let me see if I understand this, after reading your responses as well as some additional rulebook and casebook reading.
In order for there to be a BC violation, there must first be PLAYER and TEAM Control established IN THE FRONTCOURT. Then, while TC exists in the FC, the offense must be last to touch in the FC and first to touch in the BC. While there is TEAM CONTROL during a throw-in, and the throw-in occurs on the endline of Team A's frontcourt, this does not establish Frontcourt team control, as the area outside the boundary line is not considered part of the FC. The ball being tipped off the A2's hand as he jumped from the FC to catch the inbounds does not establish FC Team Control. Therefore, A2 can go retrieve the ball in the backcourt and there is no BC Violation. Do I have this correct? |
No, there need not be player control in the front court.
The best way to look at this is to consider the BC play as if there was no team control during a throw-in. In that case, someone in bounds must possess the ball in order to establish team control. From that point on, BC rules apply. So, your play is not a violation because A2 did not catch the ball to establish TC in bounds. One more correction on the first to touch portion: it's not first to touch in the BC, it's first to touch after the ball goes into the BC. |
*This email I recv'd from the State may clarify:
"The National Federation Office asked that we forward this message. Much discussion is taking place in the various social media and other places about the follow situation. Here is the play: - Team A has Team Control in their frontcourt. - Team B deflects a pass into the air and over the backcourt. - A3 catches the ball in his/her backcourt, before the ball make contact with the floor in the backcourt. RULING: This is a backcourt violation, since Team A had Team Control in their frontcourt and A3 was the first to touch a ball that still had frontcourt status while A3 was in the backcourt. The deflection of the ball by B does not change the status of the ball. This causes A to be the last to touch the ball in the frontcourt and the first to touch in the backcourt. The ball continued to have backcourt status. Similar to A3 catching the ball while standing out-of-bounds." "Allow me to remind you of a few things: - We should all remain consistent in the mechanics of reporting fouls: o Make your way to the reporting area in front of the scorer’s table. Don’t get in the habit of shouting from across the court or from a long distance." |
Quote:
BC violation. (and, this play should have gone to a different thread, imo -- it's just going to muddy the waters here as responses come in to the different plays) |
Quote:
2. Even on the court, until they actually change the rule to match this distorted interpretation, I'm not going to see that play that well. |
Quote:
If A1 is dribbling in the front court, but his foot steps on the division line, is that a violation? If A1 is dribbling in the front court, but the ball touches the division line (half over), is that a violation? If A1 is dribbling in the front court and the ball goes completely over the division line, but the player stays in the front court, is it a violation? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56am. |