![]() |
Quote:
(Granted that the partner did not make the correct explanation on why his call should take precedence.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Exactly!!!! Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree with going with the incorrect blocking call. Sometimes our partner(s) make bad calls, but we can't overrule them (well... for the most part). The conversation should have gone like this...
Partner: I have a blocking foul. You: Before my travel? Partner: Yep. You: Okay. Then, when you get a chance, you can let your partner know why it was a bad call and why. |
Except that the OP called a travel and THEN the partner ran in to "overrule" him.
That changes things, at least it does for me. That partner's block doesn't overrule my "she had LGP". |
Quote:
|
Why isn't it a PC foul? The defender had LGP and the offensive player ran into her. It's not the defenders fault she didn't go down. The defender took the contact. :confused:
|
Quote:
|
The contact knocked her on her hinny, that was the travel call
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
"A personal foul is a player foul which involves illegal contact with an opponent while the ball is live, which hinders an opponent from performing normal defensive and offensive movements."
Hinder: 1. to cause delay, interruption, or difficulty in; hamper; impede: "The storm hindered our progress." 2. to prevent from doing, acting, or happening; stop: I don't see how the defender was hindered, so therefore I don't have a PC foul here. |
Quote:
Again, this is why 4-27 is in the rule book. Peace |
Quote:
If he comes in and talks to me, though, I highly doubt I'm backing down in the OP scenario. By talking to me, he's opening the door for me to override his personality. 17 years means nothing to me (I know too many officials in their 17th first season). I know we don't overrule, I'm just explaining how it's likely to go down on a real court. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36am. |