|
|||
Quote:
To be clear, I'm not saying this is the right thing, just asking if this is a viable solution. |
|
|||
Quote:
And I really do not need to prove anything to Bob or you on this matter. I stand by my statement and if you accept it or not, so be it. I am not trying to "prove" many things in this area. But now that is over, where is your reference for giving a T for pushing an teammate into an opponents? I gave you both a rule and a case play for my situation. But then again, remember I get in trouble remember? Still waiting for that to happen. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
If I see a player who's caused trouble all night, etc., i see him shove his own player into another with intent to deliver some sort of blow, I know there is very bad intent, im only going to call the flagrant T. If i'm certain he's acting in flagrant manner im going to penalize him. I wouldnt penalize B2 if i was already tossing B3 etc. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I know it would be a cluster but letting B3 off the hook for a flagrant act because he didnt make actual contact with the opponent cant be right. On the street it is still battery. I'm not saying B3 goes to jail but there has to be a penalty to him, imo.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk |
|
|||
I'm thinking as I go. If the only way i can penalize B3 is to call it non contact flagrant tech i cant award two FTs for act of shooting. If I am going to give the shooter 2 i have to penalize B2. Probably would. Team B owns B3.
|
|
|||
Honestly, I see this solution as completely viable. You HAVE to call the foul on B2 and give the shots.
But I don't think it's completely outside the realm of possibility to ALSO issue a technical on B3.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
As referees*, we often discuss extreme scenarios to test our understanding of rules and what they really mean. Sometimes those discussions can aid in a broad understanding of how rules fit together. But it is critical to remember that it is an extremely unlikely scenario being discussed -- not a situation to look for but one that it may be helpful to have pondered when that (or another) really bizarre situation occurs and we are thinking what the @#$# just happened and what now?!? but we don't want to be the ref looking for a situation to show we have a clever solution. __________ *As I've noted before, I'm a serious soccer ref with very limited, low level BB ref experience many years ago. The more BB games I watch and the more I read here the more I think I may do BB when my kid is done playing. |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
The T is there for you if you need it... but to consider that, we really need to be talking about a "Holy crap, what did I just see" moment. Like said above, a once-in-a-career moment.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chain Reaction Foul | Freddy | Basketball | 11 | Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:22pm |
3N2 Reaction Shoe | tlavan | Basketball | 9 | Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:20pm |
GImme your first reaction | azbigdawg | Softball | 16 | Wed Jun 22, 2005 01:25pm |
Your Reaction ??? | Bandit | Softball | 4 | Fri Apr 29, 2005 03:41pm |
So what is your reaction? | Ron Pilo | Basketball | 26 | Wed Feb 12, 2003 11:08pm |