Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 994019)

Viewing the video, the official was over-zealous in making this call. imo, of course.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 994074)

It's also possible that the player (or the team) did something more egregious earlier, and may or may not have been "warned", and now the official is looking to enforce the rule to the nth degree.

Or, the opposing team put a bug in the official's ear about the "illegal inbounds play "they" always run."

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 994019)

Viewing the video, the official was over-zealous in making this call.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 994028)

There was certainly potential for an illegal screen.

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 994081)

Or what if the official just isn't that good?

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 994091)

You're willing to go there because of one call?

Glad to see you're still as perfect as ever.

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. (Post 994036)

So if the Inbounder runs almost the entire length of the Endline, while out of bounds, before coming back inbounds, you are going to let him/her do that every time?

MTD, Sr.

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 994102)

No, it's an option among all the what ifs. If anyone were to ask me why anyone did something and I wasn't there I could make assumptions. One such assumption is skill level. So since we play all these what ifs what I stated is a perfectly fine conclusion.