Lane Violation & Foul

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by The_Rookie

A1 is shooting a free throw. B1 leaves her lane spot on the release to box out A1. The box out by B1 results in a foul called because B1 knocked A1 to the ground.

What is the correct way to handle a lane violation and a foul?

It's both a violation AND a foul. Penalize in the order they occurred -- violation THEN foul.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's both a violation AND a foul. Penalize in the order they occurred -- violation THEN foul.

And if the foul occurs while the FT shooter is in the act of shooting the FT how many shots do you award?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And if the foul occurs while the FT shooter is in the act of shooting the FT how many shots do you award?

I think this is "not covered." So, as many as are called for in 2-3.

I'm calling it intentional -- two FTs and the ball. If it ever really happens, there is probably a T coming somewhere, too.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

And if the foul occurs while the FT shooter is in the act of shooting the FT how many shots do you award?

A foul against a player in the act of shooting a FT would still, by definition, be a common foul, would it not?

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by just another ref

A foul against a player in the act of shooting a FT would still, by definition, be a common foul, would it not?

If you call it intentional or flagrant it would not be a common foul. (It would be intentional or flagrant) Otherwise, yes. We have gone through this before and I think that was the answer.