The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 06, 2016, 03:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Not for nothing. I also agree with Rut's POV in addition to my earlier statement that was contradictory. In the end a T in HS awards the offended team the ball. There is clear direction on what would happen if another T was issued after the fact, but not so much for a common foul.

Also Nevada's previous example from post 6 is flawed in that the offended team was awarded the throw in and the ball was live. Nowhere is the expectation that they get unlimited attempts to complete the throw in for the T.

I think both applications are correct and I would be shocked if this happened in a sanctioned game and either method was rebuked (by anyone other than a coach of course). Both arguments are valid and I can see either being applicable.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
10-1-6 Administration ??? BillyMac Basketball 18 Sun Jun 19, 2011 07:17pm
Penalty Administration Question Nevadaref Basketball 15 Fri Nov 03, 2006 05:34pm
penalty administration jimm_ee22 Basketball 6 Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:54pm
Penalty Administration jimy2shooz Football 1 Mon Sep 29, 2003 07:10am
FT Administration BktBallRef Basketball 16 Tue Mar 20, 2001 11:40am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1