The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   NCAAW Baylor/Oregon State: Kim Mulkey behavior (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/101196-ncaaw-baylor-oregon-state-kim-mulkey-behavior.html)

Raymond Wed Mar 30, 2016 08:48am

As I said earlier, if the coach wants to continue after I T him up all he's doing is giving me an opportunity to get some things off my chest.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

UNIgiantslayers Wed Mar 30, 2016 09:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam (Post 985507)
Nothing new here: the only reason I know who she is is because she can't keep her coat on.

I'd encourage her to take her coat off anytime she wanted:eek::eek::eek:.

Rich Wed Mar 30, 2016 09:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNIgiantslayers (Post 985548)
I'd encourage her to take her coat off anytime she wanted:eek::eek::eek:.

Please, no.

UNIgiantslayers Wed Mar 30, 2016 09:48am

Forgot my blue font there:rolleyes:

WhistlesAndStripes Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:18am

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNIgiantslayers (Post 985556)
Forgot my blue font there:rolleyes:

There is an edit feature on this board. :D

Referee24.7 Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:39am

I work NCAA as well and 101% of the time, whenever a technical foul is assessed to a head coach, the last thing you want to do is be by them or address them any further because they will have absolutely nothing objective to state to you at all, and NOTHING GOOD can come from it. . .

I do find it an irony where coaches want to talk after being hit with a T, but when I do it and report and they want to talk to me about it, I don't tell them "NO" and shut them down, I just tell them "NOT RIGHT NOW", and go away because again -- nothing good can happen from it. . .

The main thing you want to do after giving a technical foul (which is like any other call when its warranted), is to just resume play and move on. . .

The beauty of putting the ball in play is that coaches will get back to coaching and the game can move on

Totally agree with Rich's assessment he posted.

bballref3966 Thu Mar 31, 2016 03:38pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich (Post 985544)
I'll never understand why officials feel the need to "go to the table" after clearly and unambiguously whacking a head coach.

Agreed. So do you disagree with Bacon going to the table in this particular instance?

Referee24.7 Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:29pm

He only went there to report the technical foul he assessed and of course Mulkey is going to address him and whatnot while he's there doing it. . .

Right after he got done reporting, he went back opposite and then Mulkey went down to the baseline to blast on Mattingly about what she felt was illegal body contact, when she got zero response, then she went in Fountain's ear, but the main thing that diffused all of it was that play resumed.

bballref3966 Fri Apr 01, 2016 12:52pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Referee24.7 (Post 985695)
He only went there to report the technical foul he assessed and of course Mulkey is going to address him and whatnot while he's there doing it. . .

I think Rich's point was that it's not even necessary to go to the table to report the T on the coach when it's blatantly obvious who you're whacking, as in this instance. I know I've called a T on a coach from opposite the table, and I just stay there and show the scorer the "T" signal followed by pointing to the coach.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1