UK @ Texas A&M Plays

[Raymond]

#3) B1 violates verticality by walking into A1

#5) push-off comes after B1 has already fouled A1

#6) we have no idea what Kennedy said, and neither did Bilas, so Jay needs to just STFU on this one.

[Blindolbat]

#1) I'll be in the minority here, but thought continuous motion was in play and shots were warranted.
#2) Wonder if the L deferred to T because of the open hand and thinking he was going with a travel or other violation 1st. Definitely think both had a PC though and would've leaned towards this being L's primary.
#3) I like it
#4) I like it
#5) Defender definitely grazed in the face by the leading elbow, but looked incidental more due to defender putting his face in a bad place. Like the call.
#6) See BNR's comment.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Blindolbat

#1) I'll be in the minority here, but thought continuous motion was in play and shots were warranted.

Well the rule is different in college as you have to have "upward motion" to reward a shooting foul first. If that is not the case, then this does not apply. In high school rules I think this would still be close, but I think we would have to show replay to know that this was not a shooting foul IMO.

Peace

[MechanicGuy]

I hate Bilas so much when he talks about officiating.

I was shaking my head constantly during the game's final minutes. His 'rant' after the obvious T (ball spike) was laughable too.

Which is too bad, because other than that, he's one of my favorite commentators to listen to. And I'm a huge fan of how he stands up for the rights of student athletes.

[Camron Rust]

#1. Correct. Contact before the dribble has ended.

#2. Correct call. Wrong official takes the call. Should defer to lead. Lead started to show charge. Trail was also "showing" by his steps towards the backcourt. The T also had an open hand instead of a fist. Maybe the L deferred to the trail because he thought the open hand was implying there was a travel first.

#3. Correct call....Moving into the shooter.

#4. Correct call.....defender was in the path, facing, with two feet down well before contact (and contact occurred before the opponent ever left the floor to jump). It is not required that a defender be stationary. Lateral movement, even at the time of contact is legal if they have obtained LGP and that defender did.

#5. Correct call. Any "push-off" was not until after he was already fouled. Defender didn't have LGP....jumped sideways and across the path of the shooter and, as a result, didn't have any rights.

#6. No idea what he said but he was clearly directing something disagreeable at the official.