Can't Find The Reference

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Adam

Thanks. I'm not sure how I skimmed over that.

However, it doesn't say for disqualified player, but for a player who has committed a flagrant technical foul.

I wonder if that is specific or just an example that was used.

[Dad]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

However, it doesn't say for disqualified player, but for a player who has committed a flagrant technical foul.

I wonder if that is specific or just an example that was used.

This action is necessary when permitting such offenders to remain at courtside would tend to incite the crowd, to incite the opponents, or to subject the officials, opponents or *others administering the game, to unsporting harassment.

This is the important part.

[WhistlesAndStripes]

I know that the citation above comes from the NFHS Case Book, but I find it interesting that it states that when the coach is ejected, he shall have no further contact with the team.

I remember hearing that last weeked, when Calipari was ejected 2.5 minutes into the game, he was in the locker room at halftime, and he addressed the team briefly before turning most of the halftime talking over to his associate HC and assistant coaches.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

However, it doesn't say for disqualified player, but for a player who has committed a flagrant technical foul.

I wonder if that is specific or just an example that was used.

Case play are most often examples of plays unless they say something that limits the scope of applicability.

If in doubt, you could just call a flagrant on the player as bench personnel and then send them out.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Case play are most often examples of plays unless they say something that limits the scope of applicability.

If in doubt, you could just call a flagrant on the player as bench personnel and then send them out.

Probably the best course anyway. One (or one more) T, deemed flagrant, and direction to the coach to have the problem removed and supervised. I've never gotten to that point, I doubt most ever will.

[Raymond]

Just funny that they use the word disqualified in one part of the text and then specifically cite flagrant T's later.

Actually, after more carefully reading the case play, sending the player off has nothing to do with subsequent conduct while on the bench. It's in response to the actual event itself and whether keeping the individual around would further exacerbate the situation.

[Adam]

The question stemmed from the following scenario:
A1 and B1 called for double foul and they go to the floor in the process. A fight is possible at this point, but the officials and coaches manage to prevent it from escalating beyond the DPF.

B40, who was DQ'd for 5 personal fouls, leaves the bench and gets to the immediate vicinity of A1 and B1 while it still looks like a fight may erupt between them.