|
|||
Notes from a recent ref clinic
Attended a ref clinic and heard a few surprising things:
1) One of the clinicians who specializes in "Two-Man" reffing told us/ advised us per the following: "...when you're in the L, don't be shy in closing down much closer when the ball goes into the low block post area opposite of the side that pertains to your primary coverage area." She suggested to us that although our PCA does not include the opposite side of the lane, we should close down closer in this area to get a better view of the matchup. Albeit, this is not the norm, she indicated that in today's NFHS level games, the players are so much better and offenses are so much more complex that it is easier of your partner in the T get 'stacked' and miss contact that occurs in post play. 2) A panel of clinician also told us that a "45 sec shot clock" is coming to NFHS games sooner rather than later. |
|
|||
In 2 man as lead, I have been going across the lane when there is active post play and the ball is on the side opposite from me. In cases where the endline is deep I step in and down several steps so that I can officiate the post play, but ideally I'm going over.
I may also go over if the ball is on that side of the floor with 8 players. Not fair to my partner to cover that much action and my coverage through the lane sucks.
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
Quote:
"When the majority of players and the ball are on the Trail’s side of the floor, below the free-throw line extended, the Lead should close-down toward the near lane line and may move laterally to ball-side." Quite similar to what the L would do in 3-person. That's the solution for the problem cited.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call Last edited by Freddy; Mon Aug 31, 2015 at 02:51pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
I hate two-person. Seriously, that's the way they're going to introduce it? Use the old time standard that the NCAA used and abandoned years ago? Stupid. Just go with 30. How many HS offenses do you know that take 45 seconds to operate? I mean why even bother? |
|
|||
Quote:
Assuming it is true, it would seem they want to establish an upper limit to eliminate pure stall games where teams try to hold the ball for 2, 3, 4, or even more minutes. It wouldn't be so much about increasing the pace of play in the average game as the NBA and NCAA wish to do but prevent the nearly complete cessation of play in the few games that suffer from such play styles.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Calling it both ways...since 1999 Last edited by Bad Zebra; Tue Sep 01, 2015 at 10:08am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Box Score: Oregon & Portland High School Girls Basketball - OregonLive.com
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
IAABO Lead Ballside Mechanic ...
Quote:
Caption (Left): To improve coverage, Lead may move to ballside by applying A, B, C technique. Lead shall not move to ballside during a try for goal or a drive to basket.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) Last edited by BillyMac; Tue Sep 01, 2015 at 03:34pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
In the case of the Oregon game I referred to, the defending team was ahead and were probably going to win no matter how the game was played since they had a player the other team just couldn't match up with. They didn't need possession. If there were to dramatically spread out trying to cover the ball at the division line, that could give the other team the lucky opportunity they wanted. I'm not a huge fan of a shot clock for HS, but if anything is to be done to prevent multi-minute stalls, it has to be a shot clock.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
||||
Agreed, completely. Camron noted it happens a few times a year. That's nationwide, not for each official. A few times per year, across the nation, does not warrant such a major rule change.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
The games that are all out stalls may only happen a couple of times a year or may only be published when its a dramatic less then 10 pts combined scored.
I can tell you when I worked games in Maine that all out stall wasn't common, but if you had foul trouble in the 2nd quarter, or the other team wanted to pack/play zone, or it was the fourth quarter and you were up 6+ there might not have been an all out stall but there is a lot of pull back out, keep reversing the ball, etc. In those situations its basically standard practice to make sure possessions are taking 60-90-120 seconds of offense. The all out stalls might be rare but how teams play/try to score is definitely impacted in almost every game I officiated (without a shot clock) by situations that went from teams actively trying to compete and give kids chances to make play to totally coach controlled and tactics that led to really really long possessions.
__________________
Coach: Hey ref I'll make sure you can get out of here right after the game! Me: Thanks, but why the big rush. Coach: Oh I thought you must have a big date . . .we're not the only ones your planning on F$%&ing tonite are we! |
|
||||
There are a fair of games where a team holds the ball the last 60 or 90 seconds of a quarter. As a fan, that's a lot of dead time to watch. A shot clock, even a 45 second one, addresses that to a certain degree.
We're going to 2 halves this fall - one of the reasons given was to have fewer end-of-quarter stalling opportunities. |
|
|||
Quote:
If we're gonna do it to prevent stalling, let's set it at 30 or 35 and spice up the game at the same time. Either way you achieve the primary objective of preventing stalls, assuming that even is the primary objective. Then again, I concede it's easy to shorten the SC once the infrastructure is already in place. You know the NFHS; they love their little bitty incremental changes. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Expansion On A Recent Topic | Rufus | Basketball | 11 | Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:36pm |
Recent Pics | SanDiegoSteve | Baseball | 1 | Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:08am |
Some recent pix.... | UmpJM | Baseball | 55 | Mon Jun 29, 2009 07:51am |
Recent rules changes and POEs please | refboss | Basketball | 16 | Sun Nov 02, 2008 07:13am |
Recent Games | Durham | Baseball | 10 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 02:44pm |