![]() |
|
|
|||
@umpjim, all baseball rulebooks derived from MLB. They've undergone changes since the first writing, and of course there are differences, but you can still see parts that are the same wording, or organized the same way. Maybe there's a league out there other than MLB that sat down and wrote a rule book from scratch, but I've seen no evidence of that.
And I'm saying it's debated and misapplied in youth leagues all over the US. That's obvious from the existence of threads like this one. My point is that due to all the derivative rule books out there you've got various iterations of the rule with different wording, indentations, etc. It doesn't matter what X's interpretation guide says to someone in Y league, and the existence of that interp guide probably isn't known to that person. My point is that the confusion could have been put to rest by MLB addressing it as they do so many other rules via a short note in the rule book way back when. I remember this thing sparked in the 80's because Keith Hernandez had it called on him and then every ump in my area was calling it because they saw it in an MLB game (or so the rumor went, I didn't actually see it myself, but as a young umpire I believed what the older guys taught). So there has obviously been confusion over the years. |
|
|||
Quote:
No OBR rule version/derivative I have ever seen has it listed in 8.05 as a balk, therefore it isn't one.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Interestingly enough, the FED rule book says you can start the game when infielders, pitcher and catcher are in position. I missed this question once, obviously a trick and clearly conflicts with rule about starting with 9 players unless one assumes that 3 of them are on the bench.
I expect the FED rule book evolved from the OBR rule book since I expect they were playing pro ball before high schools took up the sport or before high schools were considered high schools. But there are many differences in the rule sets just like there are differences in language and dialects. Suffice it to finalize by saying I have never been looking at F9 when I am set for a pitch behind the plate, or when I am BU so this is surely a third world play situation. I think I sense an OOO who would even entertain a balk in this situation. |
|
|||
Because it's not really a myth. It's a rule - but a rule that should never come into play if we are doing our jobs properly.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
It certainly is NOT a rule in OBR. It is a rule that should be headed off in FED.
__________________
Rich Ives Different does not equate to wrong |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DH and Fielder Sub | tankmjg24 | Baseball | 17 | Fri Apr 26, 2013 03:39pm |
Fielder in baseline | lukealex | Baseball | 8 | Wed Aug 23, 2006 09:11pm |
Fielder Balk?? | Spence | Baseball | 16 | Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:18am |
F1 as fielder and the LBR | Dakota | Softball | 8 | Sat Nov 20, 2004 09:28am |
Fielder's Choice | mdelira | Baseball | 2 | Sun May 26, 2002 06:58am |